home
piano music
blog
piano forum
chat
music dictionary
about
sign-up
login
search
composers a-k
composers l-z
complete list
free piano sheet music
recordings
latest additions
about us
news
faq
forum rules
links
mobile
contact
December 02, 2008, 12:52:22 PM
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
Forum Home
Help
Search
Piano Forum
>
Piano Board
>
Miscellaneous
>
modern classical
Pages: [
1
]
Go Down
Print
Author
Topic: modern classical (Read 464 times)
communist
PS Silver Member
Sr. Member
Offline
Posts: 370
modern classical
«
on:
May 13, 2008, 10:31:15 PM »
does it all sound like rubbish?
Do you find this post useful?
Yes
/
No
Logged
I am like a ghost wandering around the earth
-Sergei Rachmaninoff
thalbergmad
PS Silver Member
Sr. Member
Online
Posts: 9337
Re: modern classical
«
Reply #1 on:
May 13, 2008, 10:56:29 PM »
Dunno, i have never heard rubbish make a sound.
Thal
Do you find this post useful?
Yes
/
No
Logged
The Grand Canyon was created in 200 years
Etude
PS Silver Member
Sr. Member
Offline
Posts: 1043
Re: modern classical
«
Reply #2 on:
May 14, 2008, 12:06:37 AM »
No.
Modern is my favourite period. It has by far the most diversity imo.
Do you find this post useful?
Yes
/
No
Logged
cygnusdei
PS Silver Member
Sr. Member
Offline
Posts: 508
Re: modern classical
«
Reply #3 on:
May 14, 2008, 12:27:28 AM »
It sounds like an oxymoron.
Do you find this post useful?
Yes
/
No
Logged
http://www.classicaltalk.com
retrouvailles
PS Silver Member
Sr. Member
Offline
Posts: 1436
Re: modern classical
«
Reply #4 on:
May 14, 2008, 12:43:11 AM »
Quote from: Etude on May 14, 2008, 12:06:37 AM
No.
Modern is my favourite period. It has by far the most diversity imo.
Seconded. Those that think it is all rubbish or trash or whatever are just ignorant.
Do you find this post useful?
Yes
/
No
Logged
kard
PS Gold Member
Full Member
Offline
Posts: 119
Re: modern classical
«
Reply #5 on:
May 14, 2008, 02:09:42 AM »
hmm? modern classical? Would that be like present day people writing in classical style or music from our time period?
Do you find this post useful?
Yes
/
No
Logged
Etude
PS Silver Member
Sr. Member
Offline
Posts: 1043
Re: modern classical
«
Reply #6 on:
May 14, 2008, 02:52:28 AM »
It's classical with a little c, not Classical, which would refer to the music period.
Do you find this post useful?
Yes
/
No
Logged
retrouvailles
PS Silver Member
Sr. Member
Offline
Posts: 1436
Re: modern classical
«
Reply #7 on:
May 14, 2008, 03:13:14 AM »
Quote from: kard on May 14, 2008, 02:09:42 AM
hmm? modern classical? Would that be like present day people writing in classical style or music from our time period?
Concert music from our time period. It doesn't only mean those that write in a Classical (period) style today. Basically anyone who has been active since WWII can be considered modern or contemporary in my book.
Do you find this post useful?
Yes
/
No
Logged
gyzzzmo
PS Silver Member
Sr. Member
Offline
Posts: 1143
Re: modern classical
«
Reply #8 on:
May 14, 2008, 07:31:20 AM »
I bet that if somebody would write a decent pianotranscription of 'Bohemian Rhapsody' it would be a modern classic
Do you find this post useful?
Yes
/
No
Logged
1+1=11
Etude
PS Silver Member
Sr. Member
Offline
Posts: 1043
Re: modern classical
«
Reply #9 on:
May 14, 2008, 01:32:33 PM »
This period could actually go on forever. I mean in 200 years, will everything from the 20th Century onwards still be considered modern?
Do you find this post useful?
Yes
/
No
Logged
indutrial
PS Silver Member
Sr. Member
Offline
Posts: 640
Re: modern classical
«
Reply #10 on:
May 14, 2008, 02:55:11 PM »
Quote from: gyzzzmo on May 14, 2008, 07:31:20 AM
I bet that if somebody would write a decent pianotranscription of 'Bohemian Rhapsody' it would be a modern classic
Judging by how often classic rock stations have played that since
Wayne's World
came out, I'd say it's become a modern classic already, albeit not one in the classical genre. I'd say one of the hallmarks of modern music was certainly the developments of different musical genres like rock, jazz, electronica, and the consequent diminishing of classical music as a phenomenon in the public eye. In that sense, the classics can come from almost anywhere. In that sense, I would call John Lennon songs like "Strawberry Fields Forever" and "Because" to be classics, as well as loads of other good rock/pop tunes.
Do you find this post useful?
Yes
/
No
Logged
pies
PS Silver Member
Sr. Member
Offline
Posts: 1215
Re: modern classical
«
Reply #11 on:
May 14, 2008, 07:44:52 PM »
Lots of it sounds like rubbish, and I love it for that.
Do you find this post useful?
Yes
/
No
Logged
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rm9dzLxLvxc
never say yes
quantum
PS Silver Member
Sr. Member
Offline
Posts: 2386
Re: modern classical
«
Reply #12 on:
May 14, 2008, 10:32:35 PM »
I rather like the sound of rubbish. Or the sound that can be made from rubbish
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=Zu15Ou-jKM0
Do you find this post useful?
Yes
/
No
Logged
Made a Liszt. Need new Handel's for Soler panel & Alkan foil. Will Faure Stein on the way to pick up Mendels' sohn. Josquin get Wolfgangs Schu with Clara. Gone Chopin, I'll be Bach
Petter
PS Gold Member
Sr. Member
Offline
Posts: 657
Re: modern classical
«
Reply #13 on:
June 05, 2008, 11:02:22 PM »
Quote from: gyzzzmo on May 14, 2008, 07:31:20 AM
I bet that if somebody would write a decent pianotranscription of 'Bohemian Rhapsody' it would be a modern classic
Here´s
one
. Doesnt look decent at all though...
Do you find this post useful?
Yes
/
No
Logged
a 1 2 3 a 4
piano_ant
PS Silver Member
Jr. Member
Offline
Posts: 83
Re: modern classical
«
Reply #14 on:
June 06, 2008, 03:57:38 AM »
Modern music is awesome. I like to think of it as the classical or romantic period all over again, where most names will fall away after fifty years and some will start to emerge as masters of the literature.
I do think that modern music is making a bigger splash more so than it was twenty years ago as far as the average classical listener goes, but I feel that professionally music is beginning to turn back toward a neoromantic revival.
Do you find this post useful?
Yes
/
No
Logged
oscarr111111
PS Silver Member
Full Member
Offline
Posts: 150
Re: modern classical
«
Reply #15 on:
June 11, 2008, 10:40:36 AM »
Quote from: gyzzzmo on May 14, 2008, 07:31:20 AM
I bet that if somebody would write a decent pianotranscription of 'Bohemian Rhapsody' it would be a modern classic
I think the same could be said for most good pop and rock tunes.
Do you find this post useful?
Yes
/
No
Logged
slobone
PS Silver Member
Sr. Member
Offline
Posts: 758
Re: modern classical
«
Reply #16 on:
June 17, 2008, 09:44:02 PM »
I'm a firm believer that the proportion of rubbish composed in any given period is a constant. The reason we don't hear a lot of rubbish from, say Mozart's day, is because it's been forgotten. Today's music hasn't gone through that sorting process yet. So if you're going to be hearing a new piece at a concert, you may not know in advance whether it's any good. And remember, "90% of everything is junk."
The other problem, of course, is that great composers are often way ahead of their audiences. Presumably the Eroica sounded like rubbish to most of the people who heard it for the first time, and we know the Rite of Spring did. Today even knuckleheads can enjoy both pieces.
So be patient and keep an open mind with "modern classical" music. I try to reserve judgment until I've at least heard the piece several times.
Do you find this post useful?
Yes
/
No
Logged
oscarr111111
PS Silver Member
Full Member
Offline
Posts: 150
Re: modern classical
«
Reply #17 on:
June 17, 2008, 10:08:44 PM »
Quote from: slobone on June 17, 2008, 09:44:02 PM
I'm a firm believer that the proportion of rubbish composed in any given period is a constant. The reason we don't hear a lot of rubbish from, say Mozart's day, is because it's been forgotten. Today's music hasn't gone through that sorting process yet. So if you're going to be hearing a new piece at a concert, you may not know in advance whether it's any good. And remember, "90% of everything is junk."
The other problem, of course, is that great composers are often way ahead of their audiences. Presumably the Eroica sounded like rubbish to most of the people who heard it for the first time, and we know the Rite of Spring did. Today even knuckleheads can enjoy both pieces.
So be patient and keep an open mind with "modern classical" music. I try to reserve judgment until I've at least heard the piece several times.
Quoted for the truth.
Do you find this post useful?
Yes
/
No
Logged
Pages: [
1
]
Go Up
Print
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
Piano Board
-----------------------------
=> Performance
=> Repertoire
=> Teaching
=> Student's Corner
=> Instruments
=> Miscellaneous
=> Audition Room
===> Sheet Music Requests
===> Teaching Resources
===> Music Theory
===> Polls etc.
-----------------------------
Non Piano Board
-----------------------------
=> Anything but piano
=> The PF website
Most popular classical piano composers:
Bach
-
Beethoven
-
Brahms
-
Chopin
-
Debussy
-
Grieg
-
Haydn
-
Mendelssohn
Mozart
-
Liszt
-
Rachmaninoff
-
Ravel
-
Schubert
-
Schumann
-
Scriabin
-
Tchaikowsky
Piano Street Sheet Music Library, complete list:
Albéniz - Beethoven
|
Beyer - Burgmüller
|
Chopin - Couperin
|
Couppey - Grieg
|
Gurlitt -Liszt
|
Löhlein - Mendelssohn
|
Mozart - Rachmaninoff
|
Rameau - Scarlatti
|
Schoenberg - Schumann
|
Schytte - Scriabin
|
Smetana -Türk
|
Verdi - Wieck Schumann
Loading...
o