Piano Forum

Piano Street Magazine:
A Sudden Chat with Paul Lewis about Beethoven & Schubert

Substituting for the suddenly indisposed Janine Jensen, pianist Paul Lewis shares his ideas on his global Schubert project, classical repertoire focus and views on titans Beethoven vs. Schubert. Read more

Topic: a quick question  (Read 1701 times)

Offline carazymcmahon

  • PS Silver Member
  • Jr. Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 29
a quick question
on: November 02, 2007, 02:46:52 AM
many of the videos I've seen on youtube lately have people turning pages during playing. I've never really had a problem with remembering notes (until some performances) and I quickly learn the shape of a piece, but I have A LOT of trouble with sight reading and when I'm first learning a piece it takes me so much time to go through the notes. I tried looking at the music while i was playing recently and I started to question my place in the piece and it wasn't smooth at all.
Should I develop my sight reading more or just keep doing what I'm doing?

Offline opus57

  • PS Silver Member
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 139
Re: a quick question
Reply #1 on: November 02, 2007, 10:29:44 AM
Well... If I were you (and I'm not) I would keep doing what I do AND improve my sight reading. So you can learn faster and you have more fun when learning a new piece...
Please click here...[/url]

Though you can do what you want, you can't want what you want. (indeed a very confusing truth)

Offline gyzzzmo

  • PS Silver Member
  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 2209
Re: a quick question
Reply #2 on: November 02, 2007, 01:01:35 PM
Just keep playing piano. To my opinion people put too much value on sight reading. Maybe its easier to start with a new piece, but thats like all the advantage i can immagine.
If you want to learn sightreading anyway, sight read alot :)
1+1=11

Offline mcgillcomposer

  • PS Silver Member
  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 839
Re: a quick question
Reply #3 on: November 02, 2007, 03:05:50 PM
Just keep playing piano. To my opinion people put too much value on sight reading. Maybe its easier to start with a new piece, but thats like all the advantage i can immagine.
If you want to learn sightreading anyway, sight read alot :)

One advantage to good sight-reading is that it allows one to learn a large portion of a piece @ sight. Thus, it takes A LOT less time to learn and submit to memory.
Asked if he had ever conducted any Stockhausen,Sir Thomas Beecham replied, "No, but I once trod in some."

Offline chopininov

  • PS Silver Member
  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 313
Re: a quick question
Reply #4 on: November 02, 2007, 03:17:37 PM
One advantage to good sight-reading is that it allows one to learn a large portion of a piece @ sight. Thus, it takes A LOT less time to learn and submit to memory.

And it's also an invaluable skill to possess when playing for a church.
Some cause happiness wherever they go; others whenever they go.

Offline gyzzzmo

  • PS Silver Member
  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 2209
Re: a quick question
Reply #5 on: November 04, 2007, 07:18:04 AM
Still, playing piano itself is alot more important and i dont think you have to 'train' sightreading. If you start playing alot of different pieces your sightreading will increase automaticly.
Also, for some (amateur) people sightreading is even a disadvantage. They just play the pieces and dont study them wich usually is required to perform them good. I had that problem too. Because i started earning money by playing in choirs/accompaning solo's pretty young, i became a good sightreader. When performing, i noticed i could played the easier pieces actually worse than the hard ones!

gyzzzmo
1+1=11
For more information about this topic, click search below!
 

Logo light pianostreet.com - the website for classical pianists, piano teachers, students and piano music enthusiasts.

Subscribe for unlimited access

Sign up

Follow us

Piano Street Digicert
Customer Reviews