...Personally, I don't do either of the methods the way you described them, because there is an important component missing (at least for me). It's the movement of the hand in and out of the keyboard. For the short fingers, I move my hand in a bit, for the long fingers, I move it out again. That's because, for me, the overriding principle is a natural curvature of the fingers. There are of course figures where I am perfectly happy with my fingers falling in between the black keys while maintaining their natural curvature, so I won't move my hand much.So, in the end, for me it's the hand movement, combined with your method 1, plus a minor component of method 2 (that is, provided I don't get lazy).
Differentiate between "rotational motion" and rotational exertion" and most of the problems disappear. Rotational motion is basically a training device. Once you understand how to press the keys by transferring arm weight through rotation (as opposed to lifting and lowering the fingers like little hammers), the actual motion should decrease to the point of invisibility and simple exertion should take its place. This solves the problem of speed. the main advatage is control and clarity. The first option you described (a rolling of the hand) is almost sure to cause unevennes and missing of notes.I hope this helps.Best wishes,Bernhard.
I have read about the distinction between movement and exertion in Matthay. Though it is much easier to be confident that the movement is happening. As I practice minimizing movement, the doubt remains whether I am transitioning to exertion correctly.
I don't quite know what you guys are talking about. I don't have Matthay's book, so I would appreciate it very much if you could explain what 'exertion' is in this context. I know some meanings of this word, but none of them seems to fit. Thanks.
Let us say that you place you right hand on the keyboard so that the thumb is on C and the little finger on G. Now, press these notes by rotating the forearm from right (G) to left (C), using the weight of the arm and not finger action. The fingers remain relaxed except when pressing the note when they "brace" themselves in order to transmit the weight. This is rotation "motion"As you do so, pay attention to the kinesthaetic feeling (sensation) in all the muscles involved. This of course cannot be talked about. (At least I don;t know how to talk about it).Now position oy hand again at the keyboard in the same way, but this time, instead of moving the fingers by rotation, try to reproduce the kinaesthetic feelings without any rotational motion whatsoever. Still there is no finger action, but you cannot see the rotation, instead it may look like you are pressing the keys by finger action. The best I can come up with is that it feels like a "flicker" of the hand. This is rotation "exertion".If you now forget about rotation and use finger action to depress the notes, you should feel a world of difference in the internal sensations between finger action and rotation exertion, even though they may look exactly the same. This is one of the main reasons why 19th century pedagogy developped towards finger action: They were too visually oriented - they could "see" what a virtuoso was doing, but could not "feel" what was going on. Big mistake. I hope this helps, because after reading what I have just written I despair.
I hope this helps, because after reading what I have just written I despair.