It's not the same mistake.
If you spell a word wrong and I spell a word wrong, we've both spelled a word wrong, right? And that would mean we've both done the same thing, right? Which means that we made the same mistake,
right?
I already mentioned that the quality of the misspelling wasn't of the same importance:
yes, smaller and not of any importance for the topic
I have, from the start, not once even implied it to be of a similar graveness to misspell a trivial word as re-baptizing one of the history of music's brilliant gems beyond recognition. That is
not the point of my remark, which we've been discussing from the beginning.
It's not a mere, random word within a sentence.
No; I was referring to nicko124's typo, and the term "a mere word" was, in fact, labelled to that very post by
you:
I find it hilarious that you take the spelling comment completely out of context and apply it to a mere word within a sentence.
Therefore, while trying to somehow show irony in someone's post and sound superior, you show absolutely nothing but your own flawed judgment.
I wasn't
trying to show irony. I guess you didn't see it as your vision was blurred by your misconceptuous anti-elitism. If having fun on behalf of others is sounding superior to you, feel free to keep your conviction. I could've made the same mistake (chiding the erroneous with errors), in which case I would've been laughing at myself when noticing my fault. Would that have meant that I'd be trying to sound superior to myself?
I think you should think over your own replies before you speak of flawed judgments.