Piano Forum

Topic: Bach, prelude in G Major book I : Time signature (?)  (Read 8973 times)

Offline m1469

  • PS Silver Member
  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 6638
Bach, prelude in G Major book I : Time signature (?)
on: November 28, 2005, 11:21:05 PM
I just have a little question with regard to the time signature here.  In the bass clef, the time signature is "common time" while in the Treble clef, the time signature is 24/16.

Why ?  ::)

Why not just have both be in 4 ? 

(and for that matter, why even have a time signature of 24/16 ?  My only guess is that this changes the articulation a little)


m1469  :)


ps-  Kalmus edition
"The greatest thing in this world is not so much where we are, but in what direction we are moving"  ~Oliver Wendell Holmes
Sign up for a Piano Street membership to download this piano score.
Sign up for FREE! >>

Offline allchopin

  • PS Silver Member
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 216
Re: Bach, prelude in G Major book I : Time signature (?)
Reply #1 on: November 29, 2005, 12:04:20 AM
It doesn't change the articulation, but the implied tempo.  This could have been a way of writing something like 'Allegro' on music today.  Of course this is pointless to do now, because we can use metronome markings and/or words and just 1) simplify the time signature to 3/2 or 2) just write the notes as triplets.

Offline m1469

  • PS Silver Member
  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 6638
Re: Bach, prelude in G Major book I : Time signature (?)
Reply #2 on: November 29, 2005, 12:15:43 AM
It doesn't change the articulation, but the implied tempo.  This could have been a way of writing something like 'Allegro' on music today. 


hmmm... that's interesting.  Thanks  :)
"The greatest thing in this world is not so much where we are, but in what direction we are moving"  ~Oliver Wendell Holmes

Offline sonatainfsharp

  • PS Silver Member
  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 255
Re: Bach, prelude in G Major book I : Time signature (?)
Reply #3 on: November 29, 2005, 12:57:32 AM
It doesn't change the articulation, but the implied tempo.  This could have been a way of writing something like 'Allegro' on music today.  Of course this is pointless to do now, because we can use metronome markings and/or words and just 1) simplify the time signature to 3/2 or 2) just write the notes as triplets.
I couldn't agree more!

Another example I often use is the time signature for Chopin's e minor prelude. There is a reason it is in 2/2 and not 4/4.

Offline fuel925

  • PS Silver Member
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 231
Re: Bach, prelude in G Major book I : Time signature (?)
Reply #4 on: November 29, 2005, 04:58:54 PM
I couldn't agree more!

Another example I often use is the time signature for Chopin's e minor prelude. There is a reason it is in 2/2 and not 4/4.
Could you please elaborate more on what you said about the time signature being 2/2 instead of 4/4? In what ways would this affect the way the music sounds?
For more information about this topic, click search below!

Piano Street Magazine:
Remembering the great Maurizio Pollini

Legendary pianist Maurizio Pollini defined modern piano playing through a combination of virtuosity of the highest degree, a complete sense of musical purpose and commitment that works in complete control of the virtuosity. His passing was announced by Milan’s La Scala opera house on March 23. Read more
 

Logo light pianostreet.com - the website for classical pianists, piano teachers, students and piano music enthusiasts.

Subscribe for unlimited access

Sign up

Follow us

Piano Street Digicert