yes. i wanted to impress my teacher a lot, too, so i went and played the waldstein (thinking i was 'all that'). come to find out, after a couple of years of lessons, it was pure *. but - at least i played it with all my heart and didn't know what i didn't know. u learn what u don't know - so they are basically looking for just a few things (dexterity, ability to learn, and probably humbleness). there have been many times that i know i've played not so well - and took the repercussions - but if u just keep at it - they see u are persisitent and dedicated. maybe this will take me farther than talent alone. for me, talent is probably lower than persisitence and dedication. also, i have good dexterity.
surprisingly, fugues and things like that are just plain easy to me. but, then other things are more diffcult (chopin etudes). so i'd been avoiding what i didn't like (the virtuosity in chopiN) and finally realized after some lessons as to HOw to approach the technique realized it WAS possible for me to play these etudes. anyway, i've sort of backtracked a little with chopin (and am playing the preludes first) but i want to learn the etudes, too, instead of giving up as i had before lessons. they can show u so many tricks as to how to accomplish certain feats. it is so cool to learn these tricks because then u feel more accomplished and know a little bit more how to approach the next piece. each composer is so different, too, so there is a neverending need in m y mind for piano lessons. if only i could afford a lifetime of them.