106 and 111 are the hardest.
Depending upon speed.
Yeh only to peoplelike you with crap techniques and no musicality
Speed in music like this is obvious, you would never ever go out and seriusly perform op111 at a faster speed than needed unless you are an idiot.
Do you have to start an argument wherever you go?Do YOU have to provoke an argument wherever you go?
106 technically, 109/110 interpretively.
Schabel's hammerklavier is not great at all. And if the speed was all the caught your attention about it, then this debate should stop untill you give me a decent answer. I doubt he played iot like that so people call it impetus. His articultion his no clean, the pedalling is not clean, it's out of control and it rushes. It is widley accepted that hammerklvier should not go this speed. Listen to his other recordings and look at his editions. I love these recordings a lot, and they are my favourites, but his hammerklavier is not my favouite at all. How does that negate my remark? You've given me no evidemnce other that Schabel plays it fast!Does one really begin practicing a piece slowly? Why is speed such an issue? Does your teacher not teach you better ways of starting a piece?
Those tempi markings......belong at da SDC
and thats why I disagree with them
If you follow the metronome marks in Schabells edition you are insane. They are hillarious. I honestly think he had a faulty metronome. Even he doesn't stick to them. Remember metronomes are NOT always reliable perfectly
It must be noted...Beethoven hated metronomes, and a publisher probab;ly pestered him so he just wrote down something.
Where does history document that Bethoven hated metronomes? Mazel was a personal friend of Beethoven, as far as accounts seem to point, Beethoven was extremely pleased with the metronome.