I have decided not to see the Pianist. Incidentally it strikes me that many movies that feature pianists or piano playing (other than stories of composers) center around some pretty dark, psychotic stuff...I guess it would be too much to expect the commercial film industry to show the piano as we know it, as a magnificent source of spiritual power, joy and human greatness... Ned
Some of the settings in the movie are very appropriate for Chopin's music, and generally enhance its effect. It is ridiculous how the pianist continues to play miraculously after several years having not touched the piano! Aside from this, the movie is nice, nothing special.
The "psychotic trademark" associated among pianists have long existed since the advent of classical music and the piano instrument itself. My own explanation for this is because in piano playing, there is a constant "interplay" between the pianist's sensual and spiritual realm and such "merge" of the two (whatever manifestations it may have) is something unusual for ordinary people who don't understand piano music in the first place. This reality remains an irony (or paradox).
In real life, Wladyslaw Szpilman did not actually play the Ballade #1 (as depicted in the film); he played the Nocturne in C#m (posthumous) which is but easier.