The Scarlatti I have learned I need to play it for him
Really? Scarlatti must be very old aged now This week focusing on Godowsky Java Suite (such under appreciated compositions) and trying to work out which Bach/Liszt piece I want to do, BWV 543 looks nice.
In any case, it would be interesting, if not self-evident, to pair the Java Suite in recital with Debussy's "Eastern" inspired pieces, to show how they really came at it from different angles - Debussy from the avant-garde, and Godowksy more rooted in Romantic pianism and approach.
go12_3: What passages are you referring to in the Debussy Arabesque? I've sight-read it a number of times (almost to fluency), and the cross-rhythms in there are _nothing_ compared to what you're working on the in Fantasie-Impromptu. Have things improved?
Oh, a thought just came to me!go, dig through the archives hear and look for bernhard's post on "dropping notes". However questionable his advice may be, I know this practice trick works for _anything_ putting it hands together, and it will still work with the Debussy, though I'm not so sure on the Chopin. Truly, I've used it a million times, on Bach, Brahms, Debussy, and others. It has _never_ failed me.Also, I agree wholeheartedly with scott. Sometimes, I'm very cautious to ask to study a piece I love with my teacher if it is the first piece I've learned by that composer. This is the case with the Ravel. Though I've listened to his music for hours, I've never really learned it, just dabbled around with his Menuet sur le Nom de Haydn. I think I'll be okay, though, because she asked me not to work on the first and seventh watzes (my favorites) until we see each other again. This means I'll have the five in between to get used to his style. It's similar with Muczynski, but I'm not in love with the Preludes, although hopefully I will come to love them later.I would also go searching though the archives on Fantasie-Impromptu. No doubt countless people have encountered problems with it. Of course, you'll have to weed out the good advice from the bad, but you'll be fine with that. Here's what my teacher would say: 1) Each beat must line up, and 2)The right hand has the melody, so it should define the beat. The left hand doesn't have to be exactly in triplets. The idea is for the rhythm to give the piece and flowing and very fast effect, not to be rhythmically perfect. I was practicing the third movement of Barber's Excursions for a while, which is full of 7 vs. 8 and 8 vs. 5. Not fun, but I was able to manage the parts where technical ability wasn't an issue. Also, make sure you're not holding down the thumb on the octave part you mentioned. They're written as quarter notes to indicate they are the melody and the rest is the accompaniment. You can't reach full speed holding those down.
Op 10/1 is hard! I just started it a few days ago. That arpeggio figure is hard to speed up and stay accurate while staying relaxed.
The funny thing is that I have no problem coming down from the arpeggio hahaha. It's going up that's harder for me.
I've just been contacted by my to-be piano prof this coming fall. He wants to assign me some stuff to look at over the summer, so I'm trying not to look at any new stuff. Can't wait to see what he suggests!