But, which is the most difficult sonata composed for piano?
Here we go, yet again; another "hardest" thread!The only credible answer (for what it's worth) that's almost certanly unamenable to challenge in Sorabji's fifth one, Opus Archimagicum.BestAlistair
I'm not sure that "more trouble than it's worth" is the same as "most difficult". Still, until someone actually performs/records it, we'll never know if that's the case.
And how about the Sciarrino sonatas which are almost unplayable.
No. 3 is, for all intents and purposes, impossible at the marked tempi. But the other four don't really rank among the super-difficult modern/contemporary works. 4 and 5 are actually pretty playable; No. 1 is stupidly hard in places, but nothing like No. 3. No. 2 is also not bad, because all of the leaping around is very repetitive. De la Nuit is harder than any of the Sonatas, other than No. 3.
As far as pieces that actually have the word "Sonata" in the title, Opus Archimagicum is the hardest that I can think of, too. But besides being a silly thread for the obvious reasons, it seems even more silly to pigeonhole ourselves to "things called a Sonata." That term has basically had no meaning since the turn of the 20th century, which is of course when all of the most difficult music was written.
Specifically regarding Sorabji, the two works of his which I personally consider the most difficult have been performed by Powell, now (Solo Concerto and the Super "Dies Irae" w/e variations, whose title is too silly for me to ever remember).
But of course the most difficult pieces overall have come out of the New Complexity school. Wieland Hoban's "when the panting STARTS" is definitely the most difficult piece I have ever come across by a long way. Downie, Barrett and Finnissy wrote some quite ridiculous works, and the piano part in Emsley's "The Juniper Tree" is ultra-difficult. Not from the New Complexity school, but Xenakis and Bussotti have also written some totally-unplayable-but-still-plausibly-attemptable pieces. There are a slew of others maybe a half-step down in difficult from those, but I won't unleash a laundry list.
I'd agree with this. What you've posted is Damerini, n'est-ce pas? How do you think that Hodges' performance compares?
This is true up to a point, but only, I think, in that there are quite different difficulties in these works; I can still imagine pianists (albeit not that many!) who can develop their facilities sufficiently to present decent performances of Tract, Downie's Piano Pieces, Finnissy's all.fall.down / Piano Concerto No. 4 / EC-T, Evryali or whatever who'd still struggle to cope with Sorabji's Piano Sonata No. 5, Sequentia Cyclica, Piano Symphony No. "0" or Symphoic Variations, partly (though not entirely) because of the sheer resources of stamina required for these monumental works. All of those others are very short by comparison, but I suspect that even Finnissy's A History of Photography in Sound which, exceptionally, is of Sorabjian dimensions would not present quite such challenges to the pianist as do any of the Sorabji works that I mention here.
By the way, the works of Sylvano B remain an utterly closed book to me; no doubt that's down to my own density, but so be it, I fear!...
That is a real shame.
I have a student composing a sonata in F## Minor. It's written for a pianist with twelve fingersand virtually impossible to play. It will probably be not all that good, maybe, but everyone will wantto own a copy and flash it around.
I have a student composing a sonata in F## Minor. It's written for a pianist with twelve fingersand virtually impossible to play. It will probably be not all that good, maybe, but everyone will wantto own a copy and flash it around.Curtis Stotlar
Why, uh, would you want to write a piece for someone with 12 fingers? Just to prove you can? I would say it's the epitome of the ridiculousness of 20th century experimental music, but, of course, there have been even more ridiculous things.