B minor sonata is out of the question lol
Pretty obvious, but I listed all the ones that I LIKE. I know HR#2 is out too.
HR#2 is about as technically challenging as La Campanella I'd say. The musical part is what makes it harder IMO.
Hey man, let me tell you something.. Most of Liszt's pieces are fairly difficult. If you're not willing to challenge yourself a bit more than you usually do, then I think you should leave Liszt away from your repertoire for a while, before you feel confident enough to jump into one of his great creations. I recommend making Chopin's Etude in C# Minor Op. 10 No. 4 your next goal. If you can conquer that, I think you should be able to learn La Campanella or Hungarian Rhapsody No. 2 right after it -- although, I'm not saying either would be a piece of cake after 10/4, but you should AT LEAST feel more confident.
La Campanella and Hungarian Rhapsody No.2 are near the same difficulty as Chopin's first three scherzos!!?
Yes, I can get my teacher's help, but she might think it is unreasonable to learn those huge pieces.
William Tell Overture: Finale Piano Transcription Paganini Etude No.3 "La Campanella"Hungarian Rhapsody No.2WHICH ONE!!!!!
All i know is that he was amazingly good looking and had really good taste in pianos.
he used that to his advantage, being a huge womanizer. I also heard that he only wrote his two concertos as a means to pick up women (which explains why they're so bad yet flashy).
Not sure if this is a serious post or not.
La Campanella wins.
He definitely was a hit with the ladies, and I have heard that thing about the concertos, although I have no valid source to back it up (I also haven't looked for one).
It's false, as are most things to do with Liszt's 'weaknesses' as a man and musician.
You can a tell a lot by a start of a piece.
Surely that is less true of HRs than pretty much anything else. Given that the Friska bit possesses the greater technical challenges and generally comes second?