If you have an orchestra then the money you make from the event needs to be distributed to the orchestra.
I don't know if I could trust one person managing the orchestra for me, I guess I am a control freak in that respect.
If this is the case what are you waiting for! I hope you are not doing a free concert because you should be paid plentifully for doing this type of concerto.
The hardest part is selling the seats, if you can do that then get crackin! I know playing in the more "outback" towns can draw the entire population to you, Albany must not get that many performers and it is quite a rich town (in terms of average rent paid there) so yes I am sure people would jump at the opportunity to hear some live piano music (and rach 3 for that matter!).
But wouldn't rach 3 be a little upperclass for most listeners? Would you want to play a collection of piano solos also?
I'm always up for concerting . I'd certainly be happy to play 2nd piano, we could do some other duets together also Let me know how serious your project is and we can get the ball rollin
Take your time, dont pull a lisitsa. I think her debut was not that great with the 3rd concerto. Meanwhile, congrats on the wedding date!
Don't worry, I plan to take the required time - on the other hand.. if I played it as well as her that'd be a good effort don't you think?
It had it's moments...shes a fine musician and i suppose she is human. You can do it too, though. How many bars of piano part is there in this concerto?
I reached a 10th today! I have pictures! I did it comfortably without stretching.
I shat a brick when I first tried this bar.. its alright now though
If i wasnt so wine-tastic right now, id try it. Ya, all rachmaninoff is either disturbing or scary or both. Whats with the 1900s first edition font?
I'd first leave out the semiquavers then add them. I find simplification often makes scary things easier to approach.
Some interesting observations to be found here:https://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/culture/stephenhough/100067860/most-of-the-strokes-winners-none-of-them-good-enough/Specifically about the Rach 3, but could be equally read as applying to anything.
Man, idk. That concerto is dense!
Yeh i guess...if its over 100 pages of scary i probably do not have the attention span yet. Have u played beethoven's 5th concerto?
I havent played the beethoven.. well you know, certainly not properly.
That, sadly, hasn't stopped some people recording it.
And if you're going to do the whole Shine thing, aren't you leaving the breakdown a bit late?
So you've looked at it? What do you think?
I miss Rubinsrein
Oh, i havent watched that yet!
any one in particularly or is it a generalisation.. ?
I figured it was a typo, i was asking which Rubinstein - theres a few of them you know.Playing through the first mov fluently is still a bit of a novel idea.. i just don't practice enough, and i have another project going now. I'm sure ill post another video soon though.
So this is a really short one, the opening of the ossia cadenza (just 8 bars) - with a couple of bung notes.I'm posting this because it keeps me moving and its nice to be able to look back on these things and see tangible progress.. (this is no where near ready)I can play further than this but I don't think you guys really need to see (or would care about) a fairly mechanical performance of something that should be so dramatic.I find this section manageable (now at least, it didn't go HT in 5 minutes or anything), yet REALLY difficult to play the way I truly intend (like many sections). I haven't touched it for quite a few weeks and pulled out just this little bit last night to try and make it into something more aurally palatable. I probably made it about 15% of the way to where I'd like it to be. The LH melodic line presents the biggest problem, but its certainly not the only thing that needs work.
No, not fluently, in any shape or form so u dont have to spend time later adding mental notes on which melody is where, and youll have an idea of where you are in terms of how well you know the melody...its fun.
Clean up the bass
Oh right, well.. I know it backwards in that regard.. I did before I started. I've listened to this concerto more than a lot of times over a period of about 15 years. Obviously I have to connect physical movements to the melodies though.. but I have a totally memorized sound image of the entire first movement and much of the other 2..Playing it is a different story.. I can probably get through it, but there'd be quite a myriad of practice tempos, and probably a self inflicted headache in a few spots I still haven't devoted much time to at all.Lol. Yeah. :/ ..I'm not blaming my tools because you're right, it is mostly my poor execution.. but the piano is a touch out of tune now, and its not helping with making it sound clean and crisp.. It can get really muddy really quickly.
DONT YOU JUST LOVE THOSE BIG, FAT CHORDS?>>!!
Opening of the cadenza looks comfortable in your hands.
As far as i understand it - "moonshine" can have enormously varied alcohol volume from batch to batch... Its plausible that a half shot would be enough to reduce my tone control and accuracy so significantly that i appear to play an entirely different piece...
The 3rd movement is probably the hardest of all the movements in Rach 3. Overall the Rach 3 is not as rhythmically challenging as some of his works. Personally I believe that his Sonata no 2 first edition is much more challenging.
Are you learning large chunks of this Rach 3 at a time aj? I think it is important not to approach this too segmented or you may take much longer to learn it. Don't be afraid