Alistair, as you are keen for information on the reclusive Plinkovsky, perhaps you might be interested in this documentary on his teacher, Artur Mistek.
For the record, Vladimir Plinkovsky changed his name to Alexander in honour of his Scottish ancestors.
My vote would have to go to Cage's Etudes Australes
I'm not sure whether she is mad or a genius:
I'm not sure whether she is mad or a genius:If it has lots of flats is it (not) atonal?...
If you keep listening to her, you may well find yourself leaning heavily towards the latter. That was my experience - and I started with much the same question.Lots of flats do not preclude atonality. I note kakethewolf asked earlier what atonality actually was, and no-one has dared an answer yet.
That's because no one can Handel the truth.
Ignoring the pun (because I am beset by a rare fit of niceness ), I suspect it is because many simply don't know, and those that do know how contentious and fraught the term is. Schoenberg, who most would regard as an exemplary example of an atonal composer, and who many would blame for the whole thing, rejected the term entirely as wrong headed.
Well, you must also consider that true atonality doesn't really exist.
Concerning atonality, would I be wrong to suggest that it would be easier to write a truly atonal piece for a single "melodic" line? It seems to me that the interaction of multiple strands would imply harmonies, even against the composer's wishes: Thirds, fifths, and other "pregnant" intervals. I suppose one could try to confine oneself to seconds, ninths, etc. That might work.