I prefer consolation no 2 to no 3. By the way julie, Liszt was more religious toward the end of his life. i would say he is more innovative in his middle age years (1840-1860) with the opera transcriptions. the later works are kind of difficult to understand because he is passing into obscurity in terms of harmony and melody that breaks rules-leaving you hanging at the end of a piece. Tibor, you need to be more specific in what kind of Liszt you are most interested in playing- virtuosic stuff, innocent stuff, light and feathery stuff, diabolical stuff? cmon..give us a hand heredonjuan
Quote from: donjuan on November 20, 2004, 08:09:24 PMI prefer consolation no 2 to no 3. By the way julie, Liszt was more religious toward the end of his life. i would say he is more innovative in his middle age years (1840-1860) with the opera transcriptions. the later works are kind of difficult to understand because he is passing into obscurity in terms of harmony and melody that breaks rules-leaving you hanging at the end of a piece. Tibor, you need to be more specific in what kind of Liszt you are most interested in playing- virtuosic stuff, innocent stuff, light and feathery stuff, diabolical stuff? cmon..give us a hand heredonjuanWhat are some pieces from this period? I'd be very interested in hearing them.
I prefer consolation no 2 to no 3.
I want to play something from Liszt. What do you think, what are his easiest pieces?