Total Members Voted: 13
In a modern art exhibition, it is far more interesting to look at the people than the "art".
why visit an art exhibition for the principal purpose of looking at its other visitors when you could instead look at such people in the street and save yourself any entrance fee that might be charged for admittance to said exhibition.
could have been painted by an epileptic spider.
You mean good art must be boring?
This may not apply to you, but have you ever seen a transexual so convincing you really thought he was a woman? And when you found out she was really a man, that hetero-hard-on suddenly went homo-limp? This is why it's important for things the be communicated clearly, so you don't get the wrong ideas. However, sometimes, that transexual is so damn beautiful that you don't even care she's sporting a long one between the legs. But knowing she's really a man, but also an incredibly beautiful woman (even better looking than most beautiful women), doesn't mean these traits can't coexist. You can have a penis and be a beautiful woman at the same time.
So you are implying that Beethoven and Chopin's music is boring?
Their music is very clear and concise in communicating ideas. You may not like the subject matter, but that doesn't mean it's boring because it's communicated clearly. It's probably "boring" because you don't like the subject matter, which is very clearly stated so you are able to dismiss it immediately knowing what it is.
So, to sum up both this thread and the bigoted comments thread, life is chaos, nothing is clear, there is only personal truth, truth is relative. Yet, if truth is truth, it should stand on its own. So, for example, if a grown, educated man wishes to share thoughts anonymously in cyberspace as a teenage girl, what really matters is the truth, not from whom it seems to be coming. "A finger points to the moon..." etc.. And, after all, we all have both feminine and masculine qualities. Did I miss anything?