You say, that you 'find Mozart's music annoying...' etc. Who can object to that? A Mozart lover might try to argue with you, but you've presented your views as what they are, your views. Subjective opinions, allowing that others, for very good reasons, might disagree. You aren't trying to ram your opinion down other's throats,
and trying to dress up your opinion as fact.
Strictly following the rules of analogical reasoning without labeling the quality of this particular analogy itself:You said:X (the musicians in your list) gravitate towards Y (Schumann)Thal said:Flies rather gravitate towards crap. If X gravitate towards Y, and Y equals "crap", then X must be "flies"; "super-flies".
P.S.: The deeper philosophy behind Thal's remark is NOT to compare your list of musicians to "flies". "To each his own"; that's how I interpret his wording.
Brahms.... rather gravitated towards Schumann.
True, but in his case the Schumann in question was Clara moreso than Bobby.
Are you suggesting Brahms had more affinity to, or admiration for, Clara's compositions than Robert's?