10 no 1 is really a tough one. Many years ago I also tried that one first, since it is my favorite one (1 out of 24 favorites haha )and gave up pretty fast realizing I was certainly not ready.But the OP already spent 6 months learning it. It is a lot of work they put into it.
I suggests that "alon" spent 6 month on mastering Mozart sonatas, Beethoven, Schumann, Brahms, Chopin nocturnes and THEN came back to Chopin etudes.
however i will be kind of disappointed in myself if i stop learning it because i spent a lot of time and effort in this etude
-Come back to the piece later in life. I bet you will find it affordable in the future
The difficulty with that approach, is that very few pieces in the literature naturally make you inclined to the coordination required by this piece. The ones that do are also deemed extremely difficult so now you have chicken-and-egg scenario. At some point you actually have to tackle one of these pieces and confront the real reasons why one's technical approach is flawed.
-Umm..ok, to some degree you are right BUT im sure that you agree that an more advanced pianist are considerably more suited for op 10 no 1 than a less advanced pianist (or a plain newbie). (As a sidenote, this piece is more about streching and jumping than coordination)
Advance is vague.
Yes. I'm reminded of the bass drum player in a marching band. Can you imagine it without the swinging arms? No way Jose!
Swinging arms?
Arms in rhythmic motion, rather than strung along discrete actions.
i have a professional piano teacher and she gave me this etude because she thoughti was ready, but maybe you guys are right and im not ready yet.i have played the piano for almost six years now and maybe this piece is out of my league.