Home
Piano Music
Piano Music Library
Top composers »
Bach
Beethoven
Brahms
Chopin
Debussy
Grieg
Haydn
Mendelssohn
Mozart
Liszt
Prokofiev
Rachmaninoff
Ravel
Schubert
Schumann
Scriabin
All composers »
All composers
All pieces
Search pieces
Recommended Pieces
Audiovisual Study Tool
Instructive Editions
Recordings
PS Editions
Recent additions
Free piano sheet music
News & Articles
PS Magazine
News flash
New albums
Livestreams
Article index
Piano Forum
Resources
Music dictionary
E-books
Manuscripts
Links
Mobile
About
About PS
Help & FAQ
Contact
Forum rules
Pricing
Log in
Sign up
Piano Forum
Home
Help
Search
Piano Forum
»
Piano Board
»
Repertoire
»
Clair de Lune or Rêverie?
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Down
Topic: Clair de Lune or Rêverie?
(Read 6557 times)
georgesand96
Newbie
Posts: 3
Clair de Lune or Rêverie?
on: August 04, 2015, 08:19:40 PM
Hello!
I need advice on which piece to start learning first. I haven't played much Debussy yet, only played Beau Soir around a year ago, and once I understood how the rhythm works I didn't find it very hard. I played a few Chopin nocturnes (Op. 55 No.1, Op. 9 No.1 are the most recent ones) and am working on a Schubert impromptu (Op. 90 No.2). I wonder which piece by Debussy would be appropriate for my level? I wouldn't mind being challenged a little! I have done a lot of background reading of him, took a class on twentieth century music, analyzed a few of his works etc. So I think I have a good sense of how to interpret his music, but I wonder which one would be more manageable in terms of piano technique? Thanks a lot
Logged
themeandvariation
PS Silver Member
Sr. Member
Posts: 861
Re: Clair de Lune or Rêverie?
Reply #1 on: August 04, 2015, 08:58:23 PM
Hi GeorgeSand,
The Reverie is perhaps a bit easier to accommodate technically … though both demand a 'fine' touch in evenness, subtlety, and shading...
Logged
4'33"
sabtan
Jr. Member
Posts: 50
Re: Clair de Lune or Rêverie?
Reply #2 on: August 05, 2015, 02:33:39 AM
Hi there,
It's hard to gauge what "level" you're at just because you played Chopin's nocturnes and Schubert's impromptu. Debussy is quite different from the former two with his pieces.
I haven't played Reverie before, but have played Claire de Lune/ Deux Arabesque/ Suite Bergamasque, and many others of his music .
Most of Debussy's music are not technically "demanding" per se, but you do have to pay close attention to his little notations and details, e.g where the rubato comes in, his dynamics etc
And you'll have to try to portray the imagery as close to his title as possible. He is after all in the era of impressionism.
I would encourage you to listen to multiple recordings of the two pieces that you think of learning.
Claudio Arrau plays beautiful Debussy music ( don't mind his occasional wrong notes, but his musicality is what's impressive)
There are many other pianists out there who play good Debussy so I'd encourage you to listen to as many as you can so that you can know what sort of style that is required.
Good luck and enjoy
Logged
Current repertoire:
Haydn Sonata in C maj Hob 50
Bach Toccata and Fugue in G maj
Faure Nocturne no.2 in B maj Op 33
Faure Impromptu no.3 in A major Op 34
Debussy Reflets dans l'eau
kevonthegreatpianist
Sr. Member
Posts: 487
Re: Clair de Lune or Rêverie?
Reply #3 on: August 05, 2015, 04:36:32 AM
The Reverie is easier than the Clair de Lune, but they both are fairly challenging.
Logged
I made an account and hadn't used it in a year. Welcome back, kevon.
reitmaninoff
PS Silver Member
Newbie
Posts: 5
Re: Clair de Lune or Rêverie?
Reply #4 on: August 23, 2015, 06:18:10 AM
Neither of these works are 'technically difficult,' but in choosing one you must remember exactly this; playing the notes well, fluently, even understanding impressionism is not so much the point of either piece.
If this is your first Debussy work, I would go with Reverie - I'm sure you won't have any problems in playing Claire de Lune - but it is heavily, heavily misinterpreted far too often in my opinion. The musicality of both pieces is glorious, really that's why they are so enjoyable to play, and far beyond any of the notes or directions on the score, it is about creating this musicality that Debussy provides. For that reason, I think Reverie is a better first choice, I learnt both a couple of years ago, but still to this day they are some of the most enjoyable and fulfilling works to play.
Best of luck in either work - but spend time on it, really enjoy Debussy.
Logged
Rachmaninoff: Prelude in B minor Op. 32 No. 10, Trio Elegiaque No. 2
Ravel: Jeux D'eau
Liszt: Sonetto 104 del Petrarca
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCcEJDjwXTIXnDfAJlfx8jew/
videos
Sign-up to post reply
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Up
For more information about this topic, click search below!
Search on Piano Street