Home
Piano Music
Piano Music Library
Top composers »
Bach
Beethoven
Brahms
Chopin
Debussy
Grieg
Haydn
Mendelssohn
Mozart
Liszt
Prokofiev
Rachmaninoff
Ravel
Schubert
Schumann
Scriabin
All composers »
All composers
All pieces
Search pieces
Recommended Pieces
Audiovisual Study Tool
Instructive Editions
Recordings
PS Editions
Recent additions
Free piano sheet music
News & Articles
PS Magazine
News flash
New albums
Livestreams
Article index
Piano Forum
Resources
Music dictionary
E-books
Manuscripts
Links
Mobile
About
About PS
Help & FAQ
Contact
Forum rules
Pricing
Log in
Sign up
Piano Forum
Home
Help
Search
Piano Forum
»
Piano Board
»
Repertoire
»
why is Chopin's op 9 no 3 nocturne considered advanced
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Down
Topic: why is Chopin's op 9 no 3 nocturne considered advanced
(Read 4112 times)
marms
Newbie
Posts: 4
why is Chopin's op 9 no 3 nocturne considered advanced
on: April 07, 2016, 02:20:18 PM
i want to play this nocturne, and after having done some searches on piano street have discovered that this is one of chopin's harder nocturnes. i realize that this nocturne is not a walk in the park, but the music looks relatively straight forward, and not too hard. to the people who have played this piece, were there hidden challenges in it, and how does this piece compare to other chopin nocturnes?
Logged
Chopin: Nocturne Op. 9 No. 3 in B Major
Sign up for a Piano Street membership to download this piano score.
Sign up for FREE! >>
piulento
Full Member
Posts: 224
Re: why is Chopin's op 9 no 3 nocturne considered advanced
Reply #1 on: April 07, 2016, 04:28:23 PM
The B part is very technically demanding, and the nocturne itself is very tricky in terms of balance between the hands, sound quality, precision, use of rubato, etc.
I can go on and on - but it would be easiest to understand if you just try playing the sheet music.
It's a wonderful piece though.
Logged
iansinclair
PS Silver Member
Sr. Member
Posts: 1472
Re: why is Chopin's op 9 no 3 nocturne considered advanced
Reply #2 on: April 08, 2016, 12:49:17 AM
Chopin's Nocturnes -- and 9/3 is as good an example as any -- usually have some technically demanding parts, but usually not really extreme. However -- and again, 9/3 is as good an example as any -- the interpretation -- the subtleties of the performance -- as piulento said, the balance, sound quality, rubato use, exact legato (or lack of it), pedaling... etc. etc. can be very very difficult indeed.
I can't tell you how often I have heard a technically superb performance of one of the Nocturnes -- for some reason both the first (9/1) and the very last (72/1) are particular victims in this regard -- which just had nothing to say, which is sad.
Logged
Ian
Sign-up to post reply
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Up