Sorry, change it to Chopin's Mazurkas***Karol's mazurkas would scare women away, at least the ones that aren't trained in music. Let me have a go at Maria's.My bad.
Oh yes Maria Syzmanowski, I remember her. There was a thread about her before. The incredibly generic transitional composer that wrote like almost every other composer did during that period and yet that's enough to call her a huge influence on Chopin because she's polish and wrote mazurkas, polonaises, and nocturnes too. lol I'm afraid her mazurkas would bore women too. I will have a go at op. 24 no. 4 and see how it'll work out. After that I'll give up and take Rach's advice on jazz and pop stuff.
No I don't. I mean the Liszt one. It works for me. I know this is a piano website but hands are not everything..
OK, but I don't get your refeence to other parts that could be active during a performance, then; I'd assumed you to refer to the Wittgenstein because it does at least leave one hand free to do whatever the pianist might feel inclined to do whilst engagin his/her let hand in the playing thereof...Playing the piano using both hands (as is necessaray for Liszt's transcription) requires the involvement of four limbs, so it's rather difficult to see what else could be done the while - but perhaps I'm missing something here and I trust that you will clarify what that might be if so...
Olga named herself after (or shares the name) after a fanatical Lisztomaniac. I think it's fairly obvious what she's talking about. XD
Lol.
What about mazurkas and men?
Playing the piano using both hands (as is necessaray for Liszt's transcription) requires the involvement of four limbs, so it's rather difficult to see what else could be done the while - but perhaps I'm missing something here and I trust that you will clarify what that might be if so...
This is a family website.. I think.
can't believe i just wasted 20 minutes reading this thread... *facepalm*that said tho, perhaps i should start learning more nocturnes than just the c minor one... do they work if the person your trying to woo can play them as well? XD
Woman are a complicated thing.
But general consensus is Nocturnes are a hit.
You know what, I just realized this, but I've got a feeling that a LOT of my actions involving "showing" something to other people, most especially in piano, seems to be fueled by my desire to be "liked" by pretty girls.Wow. Seriously.Even all this talk about "dressing well" because "it makes me feel good". Many people (particularly the young adults or teens) like saying that, especially the girls. But I'm starting to think that while one MIGHT think that, one is actually really just trying to attract the opposite gender.
That's nothing to feel bad about! Birds do it...bees do it....even educated fleas do it....
Ps. Kudos to the members who called this BS out and called this ridiculous thread for what it is.
What about mazurkas and men?See a fine young lady performing a mazurka on a piano would attract a man any day. Especially if she has some qualifying physical assets. Maybe she can play anything even chopsticks. Perhaps even if she doesn't even know piano. Just standing there. Definitely. Mazurkas and men. ...answered that one for ya fellas.
I'd like to know something; which would appeal to girls more, given that the performer is male; a highly romantic, sentimental piece like Schubert's famous Impromptu in Gb Major or something "testosterone-fueled" like Prokofiev's Toccata?
date=1479220953]I really wouldn't like to generalise. Women are wonderfully varied. i know what sort of pieces usually get the best response when I play them,[/b] but that's in part because of who I am. I don't think it's sexist either to say that playing piano well to an attractive woman and getting a very positive response is about the biggest kick I can get as a (male) musician.
Wowww to all the sexism in this thread. It is very insulting to the many women on here to claim that we don't like mazurkas because we're women. I also am bothered by your insinuating that women only like simplistic and cookie cutter sounding music with "a steady beat." I'm sure our simplistic female minds can't understand the nuances of mazurkas like the superior male mind can... It is quite troubling how you say a non-musician woman can't understand or appreciate mazurkas, while suggesting that male non-musicians can? I'm sure both male and female non-musicians can appreciate mazurkas, and I'm sure that some won't. Stop making this into a gender thing, acting like women are like a different species and won't like the same music men like. What is your reasoning or evidence to suggest that just because a few girls you met didn't like Chopin's mazurkas, that this in any way means that women in general don't like mazurkas?I will admit the mazurkas are definitely an acquired taste for some, and might be a bit strange sounding to non-musicians, regardless of gender. But why make the distinction that it is only women non-musicians that can't fully appreciate mazurkas? Ps. Kudos to the members who called this BS out and called this ridiculous thread for what it is.
I'm sure our simplistic female minds can't understand the nuances of mazurkas like the superior male mind can...
This was never meant to be a "serious thread"
What? Play mazurkas?Best,Alistair
I believe we have discovered a lacuna in Ahinton's encyclopediac knowledge of great music! Ahinton, look up a recording of Ella Fitzgerald singing 'Let's Fall in Love' and all will be made clear.
Ladies, you decide..............