Well, in truth I was thinking about eating some Flamin' Hot Cheetos and see what happens.I'm really not sure what responses you'll get, but beyond the obvious "Well, what do you want to play?" I dunno. So you've got a good LH, and can play octaves. And by your short-list of things you're contemplating, you want to move forward, but in the same time period as your Chopin.Since you like Chopin, why not do all of the Préludes? Or, one of my favorites from Chopin, the variations on "La ci darem la mano."I mean, you have some technique, so you can probably be trusted to play quite a few things. I'd go with Bach, Debussy, and Beethoven, in that order.Which pieces specifically from those composers? I wouldn't know. Whatever you want. You can play scales and can persevere through a somewhat long and tedious piece, so to me that indicates you're able to develop whatever other technical skills you need, as they arise.I'm still crushing my head about trying to keep in memory pieces from the Ars fuga, and I don't see why you couldn't play one or several of those.
I think you can play something of Debussy like the Gradus ad Parnassum with no problem, so you can try the Arabesque no 1 or 2, get all the Children's Corner or Pagodes
Just in the spirit of light-heartedness, gee, do you think the OP has the technique for the "Gradus" from Debussy?Yeah, I'm pretty sure. Doing the whole "Children's Corner" would not be such a bad idea, you know? If I were the OP and looking into late romantics, and if I had any say, I'd try to encourage myself to think a bit in that direction, rather than doing more of those warhorse pieces.The Henle edition is very good: I know people say "get the Durand et cie," but for legibility and good fingering advice, the Henle is the one, IMHO. I don't who edited it, but it's very good.For Liszt warhorses? At least the second Hungarian Rhapsody should be considered. It's really not that bad. I can almost play through it myself, and I basically suck, and haven't put any effort into it at all except just reading through it very occasionally at the keyboard.\I shouldn't have been so glib about all of the Préludes of Chopin: that would be a pretty darned major undertaking, and some of them are just frightening. By no means all, though. The first five, for example, would be excellent.Or the Moszkowski étude, for example, in G minor from his Op. 72 would be a cute pairing with the Chopin étude. Make a triple threat with the G major prélude of Chopin, and nobody would ever question your LH again. And, that would be the beginning of a pretty fun (brief) recital offering. I'd be interested in hearing someone play those three one after the other, anyway, just for the novelty of hearing those pieces put side by each.
Maybe it's easy for you, but you could try the Consolation n 3, by Liszt, beautiful music.Ps: You say you've been playing for 3-4 years and you play the revolutionary etude, could you give me some advice to learn that etude?? I've been studying for 7 years now, and I dont even dare to have a look at the score...
I think I'm not gonna tackle another etude any time soon since 10 12 was pretty hard, especially since I don't have great stamina. Debussy does sound pretty good though. But personally I'm looking for something that can be played for non-musicans. So maybe Clair de lune since that's pretty popular, or maybe Arabesque. I initially thought about Un sospiro because it sounds more like a song rather than the usually crazy Liszt stuff. Looking at HR2....yeah, maybe I'll wait for a few more years, since I haven't been playing for all that long.
think I'm not gonna tackle another etude any time soon since 10 12 was pretty hard, especially since I don't have great stamina.