My follow up to your advice would be - my finger doesn't need to have any finger go over the thumb especially in the 3rd bar, which to me seems a little unnecessary.
Also, are bars 3 and 4 also slurred, or is a piano player allowed to play them mezzo-staccato to give a little contrast to the passage? If so, I think this would make my fingering easier to play than yours; this would also apply to the lifting of the hand at the end of each slur in bars 1, 2, 5 & 6. Sure your fingering would make sense if every single note in the RH was perfectly legato, but I somehow sense that might not be the case?
Do we actually have any urtext editions which state the fingering Beethoven wanted? Or at least an editor close to the time Beethoven was alive?
The key to solving this is to notice that the thumb does not need to leave the A, it remains there the whole time.
I think that using 3 in bar 3 is not so correct since you have to move that finger to the left to catch it
I also don't know the tempo. Is it meant to be fast???
It's a perfectly acceptable fingering for the D Dominant 7th Arpeggio in 3rd inversion. E to C# is really not that far. The 4 is already poised on the E beforehand (2nd bar), so it's not that hard to reach to a C# with 3. 'Not so correct' implies that it could incorrect (as in not acceptable), but I don't think that's the case. I don't see why it isn't correct.
Here's my solution. While I could keep passing over the thumb like in earlier solutions, to me, the following fingering helps me feel like I'm moving more smoothly and more easily attain the legato or phrasing that I want.
You must have a long 5th finger
Challenge No 2This one although shorter is more difficult to resolve the most efficient solution for.
I felt like this one was actually easier than the other one.
313 1321 3134 3231 4
I think the best solution is still yet to be revealed. This example is where the logical fingering is not the best. I agree it ends with 314.
The only other thing I could think of which could possibly work is 2131....
Respectfully disagree. Not only am I not convinced this is the best fingering, I'm not convinced it's even a good fingering. There is just too much wrong with it
You have the thumb on a black key when it doesn't need to be
you have the hand passing over the thumb landing on a white key when it doesn't need to
plus this crossover happens off the beat running the risk of accenting a note that shouldn't be accented
then you have the least agile finger (the thumb) moving from the F# to E in fairly quick succession.
I sure you won't mind my saying, but this is a terrible fingering and I think you failed your own challenge.
The logical fingerings is in fact inefficient by comparison, with tension points (especially the 34 3231 4, try doing that over and over again and your fingers will die, compared to 23 2131 4, it simply wins by a far margin).
I strongly advise you resolve that it is a possible solution that feels totally comfortable because if not there is something wrong with your excecution.
In fact this unintuitive solution removes the need for knitting between the fingers which feels very bad by comparison. If you have the technical capability you should admit that it feels fine and is not wrong at all.
This is a problem for one with poor control, the fingering itself does not promote that and the Lh chord on the offbeat should make you wonder too.
That is the key point of this unintiuitive fingerings as it avoids the weaving between the fingers, you merely have to attempt that fingering of the last system over and over again to demonstrate it is superior to the logical idea of 3231 4 at the end. The fact that you can move in an anticlockwise motion aided by the thumbs movement also makes catching the 4 very easy since the rotation supports its entry, this removes the tension, if you play it in a stagnant position that is much more tense because you have no motion to promote the direction.
Merely test the two fingerings at rapid tempo with constant repetition: 34 3231 4 vs 23 2131 4, the stagnant logical fingerings will tire you out and confuse your fingerings much more so than the fluid unintuitive solution of mine which can be done over and over again without problem.
Haha… Who's getting their knickers in a twist? Not me. I happen not to agree with you and posted a meme as a joke. I assumed that with all the sh*t you've given other people on this forum you'd be able to take a joke. I'll guess know better next time.
To be honest, I didn't argue my case because I didn't see the point. I already said what was I thought wrong with your fingering. I didn't want to have to say it all again. If you disagree with me, fine. As long as others reading this thread don't get the impression that your answer is the one correct answer, then I'm happy.
Here you are spreading the work of four fingers over three. Try giving 3 people the work of four and see how they go.
If repeating 34 3231 4 over and over is causing you tension then try adding some circular motion in the wrists.
But the truth is, you only play this once so then is no reason it should cause any tension, unless you are holding tension in your hands unnecessarily.
Ditto
About the thumb on the black key;Yes, it feels fine but it's unnecessary and inefficient. In order to get the thumb on the black key, you have to move your hand up on the keyboard (since the thumb is shorter than the other fingers) and then quickly back down. That is two movements you could avoid by using a different fingering. There is a reason why a B Major scale is easier to play than most other scales. It fits beautifully under the hand. The long fingers play the black keys and the short fingers play the white keys.
This fact should inform much of your fingering choices when it comes to playing music and is also the reason why it is best to cross the hand over the thumb onto a black key (descending in the right hand and ascending in the left hand). It fits better under the hands, requires the hand to move a shorter distance and is therefore more efficient.
About crossing over off the beat;Yes, but why make it harder for your self. You have to consider the music when choosing fingering and if a fingering makes it easier to put the accents in the right place then you should choose that fingering (all else being equal, of course)
About the thumb moving from F# to E;"Weaving between the fingers" as you put it shouldn't be a problem. It's grade 1 Czerny. Again, add some circular motion in the wrist and any tension you have will vanish.
I did, and a disagree.
I don't expect any of this to convince you, of course. You seem pretty confident that your fingering is the best. If it works for you then great, use it. But like I said initially, I just don't want others reading this thread to think that there is no disagreement and no alternative.
Well then, my only other answers would be;5 4 5 4 3 2 1 2 1 3 1 3 2 3 1 4or5 4 5 4 3 2 1 4 3 2 4 3 2 3 1 4but I still think I prefer my first answer.
They are fine if you play slowly, the passage is quite rapid though.
Your playing sounds clearer with my fingering than the other one which has the weaving tension to contend with.
The most efficient and optimal fingerings will make the basic rhythm, articulation and musicality come through easier so I don't see how you can mutually exclude it.
If fingering allows the musicality to shine through more clearly I don't see how it is a less efficient choice by comparison…
I'm looking for not the most "efficient" or "optimal" fingering but rather, a fingering that effectively brings out the rhythm of the music.
If you have a strong belief that there is a clear distinction then I await with interest your juxtapositioning of efficiency vs efficacy in isolation to one another using exact fingerings and musical context, though it will be quite a difficult task.
Yes, exactly! That is precisely the point I want to make with these examples.
I was trying to make a distinction between efficacy and efficiency but perhaps I should have used the term "economical" instead - or at least put "efficient" in quote marks. I thought my meaning was clear but I guess not. I think this is why conversations on the internet so often go so horribly wrong.
I think your meaning was clear. If you write in such a way as to forestall every foreseeable, pickable nit, you end up being verbose and fussy. If you said "His technique was great but I didn't find his playing very musical," reasonable people would know what you meant, even if somebody might define great technique as technique that allows you to play musically.
To me it is an utter contradictory to say good fingering technique produces poor musicality…