Yes, a chromatic nonharmonic tone in the form of a neighbor tone is what's going on in line 1 and 2 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nonchord_tone#Chromatic_nonharmonic_tone So it's a note that's not part of the key, used for decoration. You can often find them in Mozart.Last line it's IV (D major) all the time, see the base. The e sharp is again a chromatic nonharmonic tone, in the form of an appogiatura. So basically decoration around the F sharp which is the third of the D major chord.Third line I would think of as something similar, but now in the harmony in the base. The A# and C# are basically appogiaturas to the B and D in the harmony of the next bar. He sort of tricks you a bit because the upbeat hints at B major like you've analyzed, and bar 10 feels like F sharp major with the 7 in the base, so he could have resolved it to B major instead of going to E major 7 again.
lelle just a couple of quick questions on your reply if thats okay.
Did you distinguish the last line non harmonic as a 'appogiatura' as it was approached by a leap?
Also, Your analysis of bar 10 feeling like F#7 feels right to me now that you mention it. So it could be VI7. Would you label this bar as F#7/E? Or would you label it all as V7 as its all a part of a long passing tone orchestration?
Having major chord with the 7 in the bass (F#7/E) and then NOT resolving that 7 down to the third of the corresponding tonic (B/D#) would be highly unusual.
Yes, the 7th of the dominant is a leading-tone to the 3rd of the tonic It is also a dissonance to the root of the dominant (E is a dissonance together with the root F# of the F#7 chord in our example) that wants to be resolved. Of course there are examples of composers not immediately resolving dissonances, but a 7th in the bass has a very strong tendency to want to be resolved.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leading-tone
Thanks. Completely makes sense. You have also taught me its called a leading tone when its resolving from 1 semitone above (not just below)