Home
Piano Music
Piano Music Library
Audiovisual Study Tool
Search pieces
All composers
Top composers »
Bach
Beethoven
Brahms
Chopin
Debussy
Grieg
Haydn
Mendelssohn
Mozart
Liszt
Prokofiev
Rachmaninoff
Ravel
Schubert
Schumann
Scriabin
All composers »
All pieces
Recommended Pieces
PS Editions
Instructive Editions
Recordings
Recent additions
Free piano sheet music
News & Articles
PS Magazine
News flash
New albums
Livestreams
Article index
Piano Forum
Resources
Music dictionary
E-books
Manuscripts
Links
Mobile
About
About PS
Help & FAQ
Contact
Forum rules
Pricing
Log in
Sign up
Piano Forum
Home
Help
Search
Piano Forum
»
Piano Board
»
Student's Corner
»
confusion on something bernhard mentioned
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Down
Topic: confusion on something bernhard mentioned
(Read 1535 times)
pianobabe56
PS Silver Member
Full Member
Posts: 104
confusion on something bernhard mentioned
on: March 31, 2005, 12:35:32 AM
I once read somewhere on this forum (it might have been Bernhard, can't quite remember...) that you should always learn the hardest measure of a piece first,
because all of the technique required for the piece will be found in that measure.
This confuses me significantly. Would someone care to explain how all necessary technique could be found in a short portion of a piece?
Logged
A bird can soar because he takes himself lightly.
Bob
PS Silver Member
Sr. Member
Posts: 16368
Re: confusion on something bernhard mentioned
Reply #1 on: March 31, 2005, 12:41:46 AM
Maybe because if you can do that spot(s), the rest of the piece will seem easy. That would give the practicer more confidence.
I don't think there is any one spot that has all the technique needed for the piece.
Pick out the hard spots, work on those first and more. Sounds good.
Logged
Favorite new teacher quote -- "You found the only possible wrong answer."
ShiroKuro
PS Silver Member
Jr. Member
Posts: 43
Re: confusion on something bernhard mentioned
Reply #2 on: April 01, 2005, 10:22:14 AM
Just to add to what Bob said, from what I've read (mainly on these forums and in Chang's book) the reason for starting with the hardest section is not because all the technique you need is in the section. The rationale is that, the sections you begin practicing first are the sections that you need to spend the most time on overall.
In some hypothetical piece, let's say you start with section C, because that's the hardest part. When you make progress on C, you move on to A, and continue with C. Then you start work on section D, and continue with C and A. Next you work on secion B, and continue with C, A and D. Now the piece is mostly complete, and you have been working on section C from the very first day you started practice.
Normally, the difficult part of a piece is where you would falter in a performance, but you've reduced that possibility greatly by making sure you've got that section down from the earliest possible time and have been playing it longer than any other section.
This is my understanding, I hope someone will correctly me if I'm wrong!
Logged
nomis
PS Silver Member
Full Member
Posts: 176
Re: confusion on something bernhard mentioned
Reply #3 on: April 01, 2005, 12:09:12 PM
Not all the technique you'll need for a piece will be in the hardest passage. It is a generalisation, but it works quite well because once you've perfected all the difficult sections, it will improve you mentality towards the piece, and you'll have an easy ride learning the rest of it.
Logged
Sign-up to post reply
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Up
For more information about this topic, click search below!
Search on Piano Street