Charles Walter 190 vs Boston GP178???

[Roger]

I am looking for a new piano for my daughter.  She has tried a number of brands, and it has come down to either a Charles Walter 190 or a Boston GP178.

I could use a lot of feedback, from those who "know", as I would like the best bang for my buck.  I can buy the Walter, new, for $22K - $25K, and the Boston used for $10.5K.  I do know the history of the Boston, and it is one family, 1998, light use.  The Walter retails for $32K+, and the Boston for $23K+.

Any thoughts?

Thanks,
Roger

[Michele Felice]

This is a musical decision. I am not sure how the phrase "bang for your buck" relates to the musicality and playability of a piano. In my view a piano needs to be good enough and ought to be a very good instrument for an student to succeed.  Beyond this, there is a wide variety of sound and touch combinations available and your daughter's taste can only be developed over time.

You also do not describe your daughter's age, skill level or preferences. These are important; if she is going to play the piano, she needs to like it very much and appreciate it.

If your daughter is a young beginning or intermediate player, either piano, if she likes the sound and touch, will support her musical studies for many years.

I suspect that the Walter (I own a Walter) is, potentially, a better long-term choice simply because it will be new and these pianos are very well built and likely to last a good, long time. On the other hand the Boston is a good piano and an economical choice. Perhaps it the better choice, if its lower initial cost will allow you to make a commitment to regular tuning, regulating and voicing, which will be the most important factors in the piano's musical performance and your daughter's satisfaction.