Piano Forum

Topic: Concerning the accuracy and speed at which you learn pieces.  (Read 1418 times)

Offline journeyyourmind

  • PS Silver Member
  • Jr. Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 49
I've been wanting to experiment with the speed and accuracy of learning a piece, but obviously cannot because if I do it one way, I've already learned it, and can't relearn it a different way(without already knowing it). So I ask you all at the forum what in your opinion would work best.
I'm going to use a short piece as an example. Let's say you want to learn Brahms Waltz no. 15. I can list a number of approaches.

1. Learn the entire piece HS, both hands. Once memorized both hands of the piece start putting it together. Slowly mastering it line by line.

2. Learn a line HS, both hands. Once line is memorized put the hands together, move on to next line, and repeat step for entire piece.

3. Start off HT. Get a feel for the way it plays right away. Master the entire piece measure by measure, line by line, whatever suits you.


What would you do in learning a short piece of this type. Or any piece of any type even.

Offline jeremyjchilds

  • PS Silver Member
  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 624
good question, For me, it depends on the level of the piece, and it depends on what I plan to do with the piece...

I always use option one if the song is either at my level or I plan to use the piece for performing. when playing hands together, it is really easy to overlook details and to develop bad habits. I usually play H.S. untill I can hum (ur usually just kind of grunt) the other voices of the song along with my playing, and not make any mistakes ever. As my teacher says, "this method is the slowest way to learn songs, but the easiest way to polish songs" and I think she's right from experience

I use option #2 if I just want to play the song for my own enjoyment, or if the song is at sight reading level (I would consider a grade or two below to be sight reading level)

Of course, This is what works for me, I would love to hear a convincing argument to the contrary.
"He who answers without listening...that is his folly and his shame"    (A very wise person)

Offline jeremyjchilds

  • PS Silver Member
  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 624
I used option two as my second example, I actually meant option 3...
"He who answers without listening...that is his folly and his shame"    (A very wise person)

Offline luc

  • PS Silver Member
  • Jr. Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 95
I always use #3. I know, maybe it's not really the best way, but it works for me.
OSMOSE NOW
For more information about this topic, click search below!

Piano Street Magazine:
Does Rachmaninoff Touch Your Heart?

Today, with smartwatches and everyday electronics, it is increasingly common to measure training results, heart rate, calorie consumption, and overall health. But monitoring heart rate of pianists and audience can reveal interesting insights on several other aspects within the musical field. Read more
 

Logo light pianostreet.com - the website for classical pianists, piano teachers, students and piano music enthusiasts.

Subscribe for unlimited access

Sign up

Follow us

Piano Street Digicert