Jimmy's Schooldaze (A Joycean Reminiscence)By Ted Jones
Wow, Waldszenen, that was so deep, I am impressed by your skills! The title alone: "A frog called Frog". How much is expressed by this? The longer I think about it, the more aspects I can find in it. First, the recursivity of this nomenclatur. The Frog already descripted by its name, this seems to induce a intensification of perception of nature itself. This tautology, frog=frog, lifts the frog to a new, lmost transcendental level of existence, thus making the frog "itself" the truth behind the story. We should keep this in mind. Then, the first part of the story. Monumental, I might say, it starts with "one day". Oh, which simple glory, what easiness in expression to start such a complex work. "One", on the one hand, being the smallest whole number, you could also say, it represents the atoms our world consists of. So, here, we have this reference to he "microcosm", whereas in the title already the intangible notion of spirit of the world, that is to say, "macrocosm" is expressed. This contrast (micro<->macro) was also a theme in Goethe's Faust, and I think we can draw further comparisons. Take then "day" for instance. What is not expressed by this word? Day means also, morning, noon, and evening, means beginning and end. This notion of a circuit in small scale, of course, correlates again with the "one". On the other hand, day always implies "night" and thus, we already are being pointed towards the tragic end of this epic. But let's look further. "a frog". That blew me away. Instead of a long-winded introduction, you come straight to the point. The frog is already symbol of the all-understanding spirit (do you mean God?) in contrast to human "day". Anyway, the frog "went by the lake". What a grand phrase, that sure can become a world-famous quote, as "to be or not to be". And it sure would be applicable on every day life's situation (Hey, I just "went by the lake". - Wow, you also know Waldszenen's works? I am such a grand admirer of his oeuvre.) What does the "lake" stand for? It is the life bringer to the frog, but doesn't it also represent the great "uncertainty" of life, everyone feels. Is this meant to be a reference to m1469's great curiosity, because, the frog definitely is an explorer, becauses he "goes", he actively changes his position towards this "uncertainty". On the other hand, one has to see the small word "by" also, the frog did not go "to" the lake, but only "by". That is, more in an indirect way. This can already be understood as a warning towards all too curious (beware m1469!). And then, the furious end of the first part: "and ate a fly". I love your way of connecting ideas, you sure are a witty guy, "and" I'd never been able to figure that one out. And of course, this gives the story the action it deserves, although, perhaps it is already too descriptive? Anyway, perhaps this is necessary to understand the great event. I think "ate a fly" on the one hand stands for life itself, escpecially the verb here. Eating or being eaten, the major principle of life. But then, on the other hand, of course also the arbitrariness of life. The fly, perhaps sitting in the sun, is suddenly in the mouth of the all-embracing frog (remember, the Frog is also the "notion of perception", the "universe" and perhaps even divinity in itself, all expressed in the title). This connection between life, death and God, has enough potential of tension to lead over the overwhelming resistance of the full stop you understood so marvellously to place here. The next part begins with the catastrophe, following the classical scheme of drama of Aristoteles, "He choked on it". What a powerful statement. The whole world seems to tremble under the impression of these words. He choked, all values, all notions seem to quaver and to fall into nothingness. Is this perhaps also a political statement, referring to the London attacks, or terrorism in general? Remember, the fly is at the lake, the great "uncertainty", and the fly surely is something strange to the frog, even dangerous. But is still necessary for the frog to embrace it, probably referring to the "openness of societies"?. Anyways, now, so to speak, in the 4th act, we come to the "retarding moment", an explanation, which possibly tightens the impression of a political statement: "because frogs have no teeth". Teeth, again such an ambigous term, it sure represents beauty, perfection, but on the other hand also predators, blood, violence perhaps. In which sense the metaphor of "teeth" is used here, possibly only the author can say. Anyway, the tragic end is, as usual with the output of such a talented writer, on the same high level of the complete story: "and then he died". Remark how in the whole second part, the frog (that is THE frog, the frog called frog) is replaced by the uncertain "he" and how there is only a reference to "frogs" in general. The "he" dies, but "THE frog" dissolves into the superior continuum of "frogs", and so you could also speak of Hegelian synthesis: thesis: frog as the representation of understanding, language, the world, antithesis: the process of eating, perhaps even something dangerous, eating in the form of violence, but, because the "frogs have no teeth" (See how THE frog is already to a certain extent part of the "frogs") all this leads into the synthesis of death, but also a higher level of existence (for the frog, and therefore for the universe itself!). This, of course, can also be applied to today's life as shown, and all of this in such a simple form, with such elementary means, I am inclined to compare this to a Beethoven symphonie, perhaps the 4th, which is, as we know, also called the "Frog Symphony". Did you have the jumping broken triads in mind, when you looked for your topic? Simply marvellous, of course, the Symphony isn't exactly ending so tragical, but we could perhaps change the ending (of the symphony that is, of course). Great job, and I hope you continue to let us enjoy your great talent! But please make your stories a bit shorter, I have hardly the time to read them. And PS: pianonut and TheHammer, shame on you for wasting my time, you should definitely try to learn something from Waldszenen, I prefer him all the time. I mean, so much meaningless words, no context, no elaboration of the ideas, what is this all supposed to say me? Whereas with "A FROG CALLED FROG" you sure have the synthesis of style, form, and content. I mean, you don't even have a title, Hammer!
i looked in her eyesthey were like green orbs and shimmered as brightly as the day i first met heri kneeled down beside her and placed my hand on her naked chesther body was still warmas i made love to her she kept the same cold gaze, staring up at the ceiling the pressure of trying to help her along was goneafter i was done, part of me wondered if there was still something alive in herlike if she could see me only she couldnt talk or moveif she could feel every thrust and tingled in ecstacy as my hands caressed her i took one last look at her body - god it was beautifulthen there was a sudden calmmy heart no longer poundedand i realizedi was alone
dear siberian husky, your writing is to the heart. God makes it all come out better in the end, though. the people that work hard end up making it and having a good life...while the people that have everything (or are born into wealth) get lazy and lose it. also, having a small family is the norm. people don't get to experience the idea of sharing and caring. so you have sort of a selfishness that feeds on itself. whereas - if someone grows up in a bigger family- they get used to taking care of one another and being resourceful. they probably have more fun. there is a lot of loneliness where too much wealth and not enough people exist. better to have friends than money.
Criticism and reaction in the other thread! I_m_robot: Considering that there are several kids on the board, you probably should ask nilsjohan if you are allowed to post this... I have nothing against it, seriously, from time to time, I write something perverted (probably not SO perverted , and only if it serves a purpose) as well.... but on this forum?And also: NO SEQUELS!!!!! read the instructions again.
"One", on the one hand, being the smallest whole number, you could also say, it represents the atoms our world consists of.
Now. Firstly, Miss Grammar Maniac, this sentence was written by a non-native English speaker, who is always willing to improve his style in both writing and speaking this wonderful language.
Now. Firstly, Miss Grammar Maniac, this sentence was written by a non-native English speaker, who is always willing to improve his style in both writing and speaking this wonderful language. Nevertheless, I must say, that this writer does not care for prepositions and their position in a sentence whatsoever. Additionally, this sentence, as you correctly pointed out, is the writer's sentence, therefore he is entitled to do what he thinks seems best to his prepositions, which are part of the sentence, regardless their position. Finally, this sentence was written in a state of tired haziness, not to so say a mixture of exaltation and befuddlement, in which the author of aforesaid sentence in which the preposition seemed to be in the wrong position of the sentence of the wrong positioned preposition, tried rather to follow his own thoughts, than to apply certainly correct, but also obscure grammar rules. But above all:Criticism and reactions in the other thread!!! (don't take me seriously) and I thank you for the hint. I already knew that, though.
two days passedi hadnt bathedthe majority of my day was spent gazing at my love as life slowly fell away from herher malato skin now appeared pale and whiteit made her look so much more beautifullike she was being transformed into some sort of angeleach time i made love to her she seemed to get tighter and colderbut the glimmer in her eyes still remainedi contemplated how long it would take before it would fadebefore the lifelessness of her body drained away her souli decided to take her off the floor to wash away the blood on her neckbut god she was heavy
My feet, they are cold, piled under some heap of snow,and my head is being burnt by the sun.My eyes, they are blinded, by the glare of this lightand my ears, they have become deaf and numb.Somewhere within me, I feel this shadow,of strings and keys and hammers.That beckoning child who wishes to play,and enjoy life, knowing not, some riches nor glamours.The snow it's melting, my feet are less cold,my head is being shaded by trees.My eyes they are seeing now, and the light it is good,and my ears, they can hear what they please.
once upon a time there was a dudepeace
wow. torp. that's good writing. and a good story. you made me cry reading it.