I had a feeling that you were "chasing yourself". Maybe playing a bit slower would make it better and more pleasing to listen to. You'd get rid of some wrong notes and unwanted accents I guess.
If mastered, playing it under this speed sounds like if it's never going to end, really too slow, not enough power and passion. I really think it wouldn't be good to hear it slower.
But it's better to play slower and precisely and musically correct than too fast and only 'apporximately correct'.
Rachmaninoff and Liszt are my favorite composers.
You are playing that and you practice 30min a day. Err....OK then......
Because I love the piece, practise it rather than the pieces I am supposed to be playing for my Grade 8 and I have been playing since I was 4.No offense but if you've been playing since you were four, shouldn't you be playing really hard pieces. i.e. La Campanella? I've only been playing for three years and seem to be about as proficient as piano as you, and I average about 1 hour per day.
I knew that it wasn't at all to a very good standard but it is my first recorded piece and I enjoy playing it, although incomplete. I just hope ther were no Rachmaninov fans in the audience.
I can understand your brave desire to attempt this - even though you are clearly not ready. I can't think of any piece in the lit which is like the G Minor prelude - you could try playing 'Soaring' from Fantasiestucke by Schumann - it has a similar spirit to the Rach - but is easier technically - though by no means easy!
Um... Tompilk created this thread in 2005 and last responded to it that same year. We're almost into 2012, so that was 7 years ago. He said he was 15 then, so now he's 22 and probably he's graduated from college and is working. Somehow I really doubt that he's still looking for repertoire recommendations for his "next concert"! David