Total Members Voted: 28
One full grown lion, left without food for 2 days in a locked room vs 40 weaponless midgets in good health, allowed to plan a strategy beforehand for 10 minutes.
Arensky vs. a lion, the winner takes on 40 midgets.Seriously though, I've seen this kind of thing, the lion always wins.
I wonder what would happen if you dumped 40 midgets and a quart of blood in a shallow pool with a tiger shark?
The Lion makes a loud roar and proceeds to beat the stuffing out of the midgets. But the midgets have a plan in order. While the Lion blindly charges for a mass of Midgets, a couple of Midgets hop on to the Lions back via its mane to procced to gouge out the eyes of the Lion. The Lion now being incapable of sight wanders around aimlessly in pain and confusion. The Midgets move for the kill....
That's what I thought....
Great minds think alike.
Who would win in a fight?I think its lion, no question about it.
Depends on the size of the room, if we're talking about a raquetball court, it shouldnt be that hard. Picture this:____________! :::::::::: !! :::::::::: !! O !____________!a bit smaller room though.
But what about the midgets who are simply mauled in the process but don't actually get eaten? It's not the the lion just kills one, eats it, then moves onto the next. He may kill many of them before eating one. Especially if the lion feel threatened in a small room with a bunch of midgets around.
By the way, some of you have mentioned that maybe the lion will stop killing or wont consider the midgets a threat. If you were THE LION, and you had 30 panicking midgets (the rest is dead or rigid with fear, hiding behind their imaginary friends) right in front of you, you'd not go "ah, those aren't threats, I'll lay dow for a nap right here". No, you think one of the following:a) "Dis is my friggin' grounds, so piss off, or I'll make ya";b) "Yo, midgets, you won't be sticking boners into my lioness" (after all, midgets *are* sex-hungry maniacs)c) "Running object = bring it down"Any of those plus some random wounds you get will transform you, i.e. THE LION, into a frenzied 500 lbs animal with lots of sharp teeth and super-human (super-midget) strength. And after the first two waves of midget attack are exhausted, you'll have a little time for a snack, which -- conveniently! -- will already be strewn around you. The midgets don't have that. And consider: Any necrophiliac midgets will already be distracted.The primal instinct of THE LION is survival. The primal instinct of the midget is hiding in a flowerpot. LION wins.
I tend to favor the lion, on the grounds that midgets (or giant humans, for that matter) are fairly fragile and vulnerable to those teeth and claws, while lions can take a lot of damage and remain functional for a while.But I think there are a couple of mistakes above.Why do we assume midgets are unarmed? Midgets being at some risk for assault are likely to have something on them, more likely than average size people because they are targeted more. There is no chance of finding 40 all unarmed, unless they are in a swimming pool or shower. They also have probably been assaulted and have less natural repugnance towards violence to overcome - not only are they armed with at least knives and almost certainly some firearms, but they have already overcome the mindset problem. Next. Male lions don't have sex. Well, one does, the pride leader. All other males don't get a chance unless they someday challenge and overcome the alpha lion. By the way, I've seen lions having sex, and while it may be frequent, it is also quick, just a few seconds.
I'm assuming the conditions have been artificially created where the lion has been captured from the wild and placed inside a racquetball court along with 40 healthy but unarmed midgets. I'm also assuming that the midgets MUST kill the lion or they face execution. Under these conditions the lion and midgets are unlikely to behave as they would in their natural environment. So the argument about the lion being territorial and defending its pride or lioness doesn’t make any sense. I would say the lion would be in a greater state of anxiety and confusion than the midgets. The lion wouldn’t understand its predicament whereas the midgets would and that definitely gives them the advantage over and above pure brute force.
Komodo Island in Indonesia......An arensky true life adventure....
i was thinking 'for the lion.' ok. the midgets get the viagra and the lion gets a case of beer. but, this is beginning to sound gross. after all, once the lion's mouth is held open and one beer after another downed - it will be tired and thus easy to take care of. being an animal lover, i'd probably not kill it - but just pet it and then try to figure out a way to put a collar on.
And thus begins the new challenge:pianistimo Vs 40 sex-hungry maniac midgets pumped up with viagra.