Home
Piano Music
Piano Music Library
Top composers »
Bach
Beethoven
Brahms
Chopin
Debussy
Grieg
Haydn
Mendelssohn
Mozart
Liszt
Prokofiev
Rachmaninoff
Ravel
Schubert
Schumann
Scriabin
All composers »
All composers
All pieces
Search pieces
Recommended Pieces
Audiovisual Study Tool
Instructive Editions
Recordings
PS Editions
Recent additions
Free piano sheet music
News & Articles
PS Magazine
News flash
New albums
Livestreams
Article index
Piano Forum
Resources
Music dictionary
E-books
Manuscripts
Links
Mobile
About
About PS
Help & FAQ
Contact
Forum rules
Pricing
Log in
Sign up
Piano Forum
Home
Help
Search
Piano Forum
»
Piano Board
»
Miscellaneous
»
Composer choices in notation . . .
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Down
Topic: Composer choices in notation . . .
(Read 1365 times)
alzado
PS Silver Member
Sr. Member
Posts: 573
Composer choices in notation . . .
on: December 16, 2005, 03:02:06 PM
Folks--
Those of you with a knowledge of theory, or a music major, will have to help me on this one.
I have a belief that some of the difficult notation one sometimes encounters is unnecessary. Examples ------------>
1. Extreme use of leger marks. Where several measures are up above C6 or in the deep bass such as the C1-B1 range. Cure: Avoid these by use of the dotted line with the V8 notation.
2. Passages riddled with double accidentals. Cure: change the key signature. Some of this occurs because the composer wishes to change keys without changing the key signature. Cure: Change keys in the signature. Formally changing the key is often done by some composers, e.g., Chopin, but rarely or never by others (MacDowell).
3. Confusion as to which hand is to play a note or notes. This is easily clarified if the composer wishes to do so. Cure: put note stems up for the right hand notes, stems down for the left hand. (Myra Hess uses this in her transcription of "Jesu." And many other examples can be found.)
Any other examples? People may not realize that composers have a lot of latitude in how they choose to write their notation. The piece will sound the same either way, but sometimes it is more easy to read if the notational choices are wisely made by the composer.
Logged
quantum
PS Silver Member
Sr. Member
Posts: 6260
Re: Composer choices in notation . . .
Reply #1 on: December 17, 2005, 02:21:38 AM
1. In the past keyboard music had more than two standard clefs. Composers would use the clef which placed most notes on the staff. In cases where there is a mix of extreeme ledger line notes plus notes on staff, it may not be practical to use 8va notation. Keeping pitches as written also give you a guage to how seperated notes actually are from each other. Eg: Scriabin 7th sonata.
2. This depends the context of a key change, more specifically it's duration. Different durations of a key change can have very different effects on the music. Tonisizations are short, and usually dont' warrant key signature change. Modulations are longer, but may only last for a few phrases. Key change for an extended period along with deliniation of a new section of a piece may warrant key signature changes.
3. A score is descriptive not perscriptive (also applies to #2). The object is to present the notes and their function relative to each other in the clearest way possible. This may sometimes mean that hand division are more obscure. Imagine learning a Bach Fugue notated for the hands rather than to outline the fugal subjects. Knowing which notes belong to which voices may become verry confusing. Leave the job of assigning notes to fingers with the finger numbers and line divisions.
Logged
Made a Liszt. Need new Handel's for Soler panel & Alkan foil. Will Faure Stein on the way to pick up Mendels' sohn. Josquin get Wolfgangs Schu with Clara. Gone Chopin, I'll be Bach
alzado
PS Silver Member
Sr. Member
Posts: 573
Re: Composer choices in notation . . .
Reply #2 on: December 19, 2005, 12:10:07 AM
Thank you very much for writing such an intelligent and helpful reply.
Alzado
Logged
Sign-up to post reply
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Up