Piano Forum



The Complete Piano Works of 16 Composers
Piano Street’s digital sheet music library is constantly growing. With the additions made during the past months, we now offer the complete solo piano works by sixteen of the most famous Classical, Romantic and Impressionist composers in the web’s most pianist friendly user interface. Read more >>

Topic: Lang Lang  (Read 2664 times)

Offline amee

  • PS Silver Member
  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 506
Lang Lang
on: September 25, 2003, 12:22:26 PM
I recently saw an article in the newspaper about this amazing pianist.  It talked a lot about all the sacrifices his parents made to let him continue playing the piano, something I found very moving.  Does anyone have any facts or comments about Lang Lang?

He's coming to New Zealand to perform in 2004, Yay!
"Simplicity is the highest goal, achievable when you have overcome all difficulties." - Frederic Chopin

Offline eddie92099

  • PS Silver Member
  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1816
Re: Lang Lang
Reply #1 on: September 25, 2003, 04:43:36 PM
He opened this years BBC Proms in London with Tchaikovsky's First (which he has just recorded with Barenboim coupled with Rach 3). He was riled by the critics though - what I have heard if his playing is unimaginative (he managed to make Balakirev's Islamey sound like Scarlatti!),
Ed

Offline thracozaag

  • PS Silver Member
  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1311
Re: Lang Lang
Reply #2 on: September 25, 2003, 06:20:29 PM
"Lang-Lang is the JLO of the piano"

--Earl Wild


No matter how many times I hear that, it still cracks me up.
"We have to reach a certain level before we realize how small we are."--Georges Cziffra

Offline tosca1

  • PS Silver Member
  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 328
Re: Lang Lang
Reply #3 on: September 25, 2003, 09:20:44 PM
Lang Lang is a phenomenal talent and a glorious pianist but I have not heard him live and l am looking forward to that experience when he tours this country next year.  

I heard him earlier this year on Bill McLachlan's "St Paul's Sunday" which is an excellent interview and performance programme from Minnesota hosted  by Bill. His playing was technically immaculate and utterly inspired and I do not agree with those detractors who say that his playing is "unimaginative".

Regards,
Robert.

Offline Hmoll

  • PS Silver Member
  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 881
Re: Lang Lang
Reply #4 on: September 25, 2003, 10:55:35 PM
I saw him at the opening of the Mostly Mozart festival in NY.

He played the Mendelssohn G minor concerto, and the Liszt Don Juan Fantasy as an encore (the Liszt piece that never ends).

There are a lot of physical histrionics in his playing - gazing at the ceiling, gesturing to the orchestra, smiling a lot - none of which conveyed any authentic emotion, or furthered the music in any way.

I did not find his playing very compelling, and could not even say his technique blew me away.

Keep in mind that he is pretty young, and could still mature into an artist. I'll check him out again in about 10 yrs.
"I am sitting in the smallest room of my house. I have your review before me. In a moment it will be behind me!" -- Max Reger

Offline Bosendorfer_214

  • PS Silver Member
  • Jr. Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 76
Re: Lang Lang
Reply #5 on: September 26, 2003, 02:27:38 AM
I saw him live and met him afterwards.  He has more personality on stage than in person.  The Liszt Paggini Etudes were te most memorable.  No wrong notes.  very clean.  Although it was a wonderful performance i did not feel in any way, a part of it.  Those of you who have heard the great pianists of our century live know what I mean.  he played Horowitz's Stars and Stripes Forever as an encore.  

Off to see Van Cliburn tonight...
Pianists are like firecrackers, they blow up sooner or later.

Offline eddie92099

  • PS Silver Member
  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1816
Re: Lang Lang
Reply #6 on: September 26, 2003, 03:21:58 PM
Quote


Off to see Van Cliburn tonight...


Where? And what is he playing?
Ed

Offline meiting

  • PS Silver Member
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 141
Re: Lang Lang
Reply #7 on: September 26, 2003, 07:16:12 PM
He's a phenomenal talent, but you don't mature by playing 150 concerts a year.
Living for music is a sad state. Living to play music is not.

Offline Bosendorfer_214

  • PS Silver Member
  • Jr. Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 76
Re: Lang Lang
Reply #8 on: September 26, 2003, 10:12:23 PM
Tschaikowsky B-flat minor.  Sowthwest United States.

He gave three encores: Rachmaninov Prelude Op.32 No 12, Revolutionary Etude, and nobody is sure wat the last one was.  There was a 15 minute standing ovation.
Pianists are like firecrackers, they blow up sooner or later.

Offline eddie92099

  • PS Silver Member
  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1816
Re: Lang Lang
Reply #9 on: September 27, 2003, 01:11:49 AM
Shame he never plays in London!
Ed

Offline tosca1

  • PS Silver Member
  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 328
Re: Lang Lang
Reply #10 on: September 27, 2003, 03:25:02 AM
But did you not say that he opened this year's BBC proms in London by playing the Tchaikovsky First Piano Concerto?

Regards,
Robert.  

Offline thracozaag

  • PS Silver Member
  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1311
Re: Lang Lang
Reply #11 on: September 27, 2003, 04:26:44 AM
Quote
But did you not say that he opened this year's BBC proms in London by playing the Tchaikovsky First Piano Concerto?

Regards,
Robert.  



 I think he was referring to Cliburn, not Lang-Lang.
"We have to reach a certain level before we realize how small we are."--Georges Cziffra

Offline eddie92099

  • PS Silver Member
  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1816
Re: Lang Lang
Reply #12 on: September 27, 2003, 04:40:51 PM
To clarify:
Lang Lang opened the Proms
It is a shame Van Cliburn never plays in London
Ed

Offline Laurationg

  • PS Silver Member
  • Newbie
  • ***
  • Posts: 22
Re: Lang Lang
Reply #13 on: October 07, 2003, 12:42:10 PM
Do you guys enjoying watching a pianist who moves a lot physically?  I find that quite distracting.....

Offline eddie92099

  • PS Silver Member
  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1816
Re: Lang Lang
Reply #14 on: October 08, 2003, 01:38:21 AM
In moderation it is okay, but I saw Alexander Taradze doing Rachmaninov's Second recently and he was literally all over the place (sitting incredibly far away from the piano and literally standing up in some places!) and that was distracting,
Ed

Offline redberry

  • PS Silver Member
  • Jr. Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 44
Re: Lang Lang
Reply #15 on: November 20, 2003, 12:02:08 PM
Share my view of the supertalented Lang Lang- I saw him live in Seoul, Korea. It was great and unusual fun  ::), especially the encores with his father who played on a chinese traditional instrument, playing together. It was great !! He is an emotional artist-and most various acting one like the first half he weared western  concert clothes and the second half he changed to a chinesestyle clothes (blue colour)-very thought ful way...Yes, it was a great and exceptional event!

Offline Hmoll

  • PS Silver Member
  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 881
Re: Lang Lang
Reply #16 on: November 20, 2003, 11:38:35 PM
I don't find his playing interesting at all. His reviewers are staring to catch up to this, as well. The NY Tmes pretty much panned his NY debut, saying his playing was not very coherent, and not even technically compelling.

His on-stage antics are annoying, as well.
"I am sitting in the smallest room of my house. I have your review before me. In a moment it will be behind me!" -- Max Reger

Offline e60m5

  • PS Silver Member
  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 369
Re: Lang Lang
Reply #17 on: December 14, 2003, 04:41:07 AM
The NY Times slammed his Carnegie solo recital debut.

I was lucky enough to be there at that recital, and I cannot agree with the critics.

It seems all too easy for people to jump on the proverbial bandwagon nowadays in slamming a widely-accepted talent for the sake of wanting to seem sophisticated and one step above from the rest who are in approval of this said person. Take a step back, and what are you criticising?

I read the review by the NYTimes with interest. The critic in question slammed Lang Lang for his interpretations of the music; they criticised his interpretation of the Schubert Wanderer Fantasy, praised his rendition of the D Flat Chopin Nocturne; panned his encore of Schumann's Traumerie, and rubbished his Schuman Abegg variations.

Yet what do they want Lang Lang to do? Offer up an interpretation of those pieces that has been heard a million times over?

If that is what they want, then they should go listen to any other pianist in the world (after first removing their head from their posterior). I support Lang Lang in that he is not afraid to put forth his own, personal interpretations of a piece in the face of potential criticism. The thing about Lang Lang's performance that Friday was that it was music, and it was music that moved. It was the essence of piano playing at its finest, and were it to conjure some controversy in the process, then so be it.

I feel sorry for that NYTimes reporter who thinks he is too good to like the playing of Lang Lang. And others who have similarly criticised his playing should hear him first before spouting off on their so far invalid opinions.

Offline Hmoll

  • PS Silver Member
  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 881
Re: Lang Lang
Reply #18 on: December 14, 2003, 06:09:17 PM
Quote
The NY Times slammed his Carnegie solo recital debut.

Yet what do they want Lang Lang to do? Offer up an interpretation of those pieces that has been heard a million times over?

If that is what they want, then they should go listen to any other pianist in the world (after first removing their head from their posterior). I support Lang Lang in that he is not afraid to put forth his own, personal interpretations of a piece in the face of potential criticism. The thing about Lang Lang's performance that Friday was that it was music, and it was music that moved. It was the essence of piano playing at its finest, and were it to conjure some controversy in the process, then so be it.



It's been a few weeks since I read that article, but from what I remember, the writer was being critical of Lang Lang's lack of interpretation, and not demonstrating an understanding of the music.

The bandwagon - if one exists - seems to be in LL's favor at the moment, since he has a huge DG contract and a lot of engagements. It's refreshing to see reviewers with the courage to call a spade a spade.
"I am sitting in the smallest room of my house. I have your review before me. In a moment it will be behind me!" -- Max Reger

Offline jennbo

  • PS Silver Member
  • Jr. Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 42
Re: Lang Lang
Reply #19 on: December 15, 2003, 02:28:24 AM
i've seen him perform on tv.  to me he sounded a bit dry.  his techniques were nothing special.  i think he'll need many more years to mature into a great pianist (that is if he will actually make it).   I still favor the greats like richter, de la rocca, horowitz and etc over him.  

Offline The Tempest

  • PS Silver Member
  • Jr. Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 37
Re: Lang Lang
Reply #20 on: December 18, 2003, 04:57:12 AM
IMO, he's very good but not stunning, eg he'll never be able to throw a Cziffra technique.

He's coming to Australia in August 2004, though. Woohoo!
"Music owes almost as great a debt to Bach as religion does to its founder."

Robert Schumann
For more information about this topic, click search below!
 

Logo light pianostreet.com - the website for classical pianists, piano teachers, students and piano music enthusiasts.

Subscribe for unlimited access

Sign up

Follow us

Piano Street Digicert