anyone have a recording of ANY of his songs?
wow that was so big I couldn't read it, so I'll keep bumping for bumping sake.HI DARKWIND! (waves a silly hand in his direction)
it is also impressively difficult, though difficult to know if the pianist played any wrong notes!!
Quoteit is also impressively difficult, though difficult to know if the pianist played any wrong notes!! I find that much of Sorabji's work is gestural, and that "right" and "wrong" notes are not a main concern. I think much of Sorabji's work deals with contours of sound. For instance, in sections of the OC where there is just a mess of chords all the place, I don't think each individual chord is of any importance. What's important is the overall contour of the resulting "collage" of sound. It's like in certain modern scores where the composer writes out only target notes and connects them with a black line. The black line means basically to just fill in with notes. The actual notes aren't important, so the composer doesn't write them. It's just a sound gesture. Sorabji's music is like this, except he writes out the notes. That's what it sounds like to me. Hitting wrong notes doesn't matter if the proper sound is conveyed.
still, what would hamelin do with it?
This is the same thing I said on another thread. I could sit down and play the Opus Clavicembalisticum for an audience without ever seeing the music, and I'm sure most of them wouldn't know the difference.-Ludwig Van Rachabji
Quote from: Ludwig Van Rachabji on November 23, 2004, 08:35:13 PMThis is the same thing I said on another thread. I could sit down and play the Opus Clavicembalisticum for an audience without ever seeing the music, and I'm sure most of them wouldn't know the difference.-Ludwig Van RachabjiThen, when you finish four or five hours later, you would have people lining up to tell you how utterly astounding your performance was.