bach did not play on a piano like we do!
Is that because the Piano's were different compared to nowadays? Or because he needed to play that way due to a health problem (if any)? Or perhaps to suit/express his own repertoire in a certain way? I'm curious ^_^
Greetings.Yes absolutely the arm weight should be involved. My teacher stresses that to me. Arthur Rubinstein has said that he doesn't tire during a recital because of the help of the arm. Not only the arm should be involved, but the wrists of course, the back and the legs. The whole body should be in a condition that supports playing. I constantly have to be reminded to use the arm weight and it helps tremendously. Without it, it is much harder to produce a rich sound. Hope this helps.
Ok right....Last week my teacher said i must hold my arm most of the time still. She said i must play with my wrist and fingers....and you guys tell me now the opposite (correct spelling? ). So i'm a little bit confused now
just like singers, you can look at a pianists neck. if their veins are sticking out or the neck is rigid, they are trying too hard. if you start at the neck - you will be able to move down the body relaxing efficiently. if you just start at the arms (i've learned) you can still hold tension in your body without noticing. sometimes it takes someone else pointing it out to you. neck, shoulders, arms, wrists ... move them around.
I think what your teacher must have meant is "play more using wrists and fingers"... As in, still use all your arm, but free up and use the wrists and fingersmore. They might be a bit stiff/tense.The thing is, it's so hard to put accurately into words, and easily misunderstood. What really helped me was to watch some videos of pianists playing, and to pay attention to how every body part worked together to get the fingers to the notes. It's much easier to see than to say.
"My teacher says I play too tenses."So what else has your teacher done besides mentioning the obvious?One significant reason why tension occures is due to poor technique, in this case, it is the involvement of more than the necessary muscles to a set task. If this is the case, then you should be instructed on the correct body movements to correct poor technique which schould virtually eliminate any unnecessary tension that is detrimental to piano playing.Verbally mentioning it is a start. Now you teacher should teach.
Thanks for the replies.Well, she explained that my arms should be very loose, like wet noodles almost when playing. She also grabbed my hand and told me to let my arm go totally limp and then she flung my arm around a bit and said this is how loose I was supposed to play. She also said the fingers should be controlled, and that instead of pressing down with the fingers, she said to press down with the natural weight and gravity of the arm, as well as the wrist. She made an analogy to a water hose explaining that if the hose is tense and wound up, then the water does not flow through right or is stopped altogether. She said music was the same way. She then showed me an exercise that is similar to gravity drops I have read about here, as well as just loosening the arms and wrists up away from the piano. I also noticed she kinda likes me to keep my hands very close to the keyboard itself, kind of gliding over the keys, keeping them as low as possible. Yes the relaxed arm approach is absolutely right. The reason for this is that when you play with just the fingers, you will get tired, especially in places with fast scales and arpeggios and not to mention powerfull chords. With proper arm support and flexible wrist you will not tire as much and have a richer sound.
Up to this point, I have felt no need to move my arms or anything like that because I have felt my fingers adequete enough to get the job done so far. Apparently this isn't the case though as it seems the majority advocates using the whole arm and body. Could you explain?