Piano Forum

Topic: Interpreting Scarlatti  (Read 5969 times)

Offline kghayesh

  • PS Silver Member
  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 489
Interpreting Scarlatti
on: March 11, 2006, 07:30:34 AM
I wanted to know if there were special issues to consider when playing Scarlatti. It is stange that the score i have doesn't contain any dynamics and it is written that dynamics are left to the player.

So, if there are some general guidelines to take care of when playing Scarlatti, i'd like to know please...

Offline zheer

  • PS Silver Member
  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 2794
Re: Interpreting Scarlatti
Reply #1 on: March 11, 2006, 08:08:36 AM
Dont know a lot about scarlatti, all i know is that a like his piano music more than Bachs piano music.
    Its a good idean not to play him like, Beethoven, Mozart, or Liszt or Bach. Play him more like Chopin and that means haw you would pedal chopin, haw you woud use dynamics , rubato and phrasing in chopin. Its only my opinion.
" Nothing ends nicely, that's why it ends" - Tom Cruise -

Offline pianalex

  • PS Silver Member
  • Jr. Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 98
Re: Interpreting Scarlatti
Reply #2 on: March 11, 2006, 08:34:30 AM
the sonatas were written with the harpsichord in mind and therefore have no marked dynamics.  The use of texture, number of voices and other imaginative means are made great use of.  Anyhow the absence of dynamics surely allows pianists great freedom for creative interpretation on that front.  perhaps listening to recordings by such as Pletnev, Sudbin, Zacharias, horrowitz etc, would be a good cue for personal experiment.  Use dynamics to underline structure, colour and orchestration.  Personally I prefer the sonatas on the piano to the h'chord.
Incidently dynamic markings in Mozart and Haydn keyboard works are far from exhaustive, and left alot either for a knowledge of the conventions, or individual interpretation.

Offline mcgillcomposer

  • PS Silver Member
  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 839
Re: Interpreting Scarlatti
Reply #3 on: March 11, 2006, 07:09:24 PM
the sonatas were written with the harpsichord in mind and therefore have no marked dynamics. 

This answer is relatively true, but not 100% accurate. Scarlatti DID have the option of varying dynamic colours...and was well aware of the possibilites of the fortepiano (Maria Barbara had several fortepianos where Scarlatti worked for her in Spain).  Even so, it is quite easy to get a variety of dynamic contrasts on the HARPSICHORD by using the two manuals (Haydn exploits this in some of his sonatas).  As for the original question...well, make sure you notice the register changes, and the use of voicing in Scarlatti's sonatas.  THIS is exactly how he compensated for the harpsichord's lack of dynamic contrast as compared to the fortepiano.

In essence, I wouldn't worry so much about dynamic change (piano to forte, etc.).  I would concentrate more on the colour of the sound.  When there is a significant change in register, or an obvious change in texture...change the colour of your playing (using pedals or not...this is where you can be creative).  Too much emphasis is placed on accurate performance practice, when in all reality, we have no idea how these things sounded in Scarlatti's time.  Of course this debate has raged on in scholarly music journals for decades...but it is no coincidence that they still haven't reached a conclusion that everyone agrees with! ;)  Also, remember that you are playing his works on the piano, not the harpsichord...so I wouldn't try to immitate the harpsichord...make them your own and bring them into the 21st century...after all, that's what Liszt did in his own century with music from the masters of the past...or...Busoni with Bach.

Good luck...Scarlatti is amazing, and quite a revelation to play!

- Andrew

P.S.  If you are interested in a VERY good analysis of the sonatas, see Ralph Kirkpatrick's book entitled "Scarlatti".  It's an amazing piece of literature, and probably remains the best-known (for a reason) book on Scarlatti's life and music.  You could also try Malcolm Boyd's book...but he tries to stay away from the sonatas in his writing because Kirkpatrick's earlier effort was so complete and well done (Boyd studied with Kirk.).
Asked if he had ever conducted any Stockhausen,Sir Thomas Beecham replied, "No, but I once trod in some."

Offline pianalex

  • PS Silver Member
  • Jr. Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 98
Re: Interpreting Scarlatti
Reply #4 on: March 11, 2006, 11:03:26 PM
oh - that's interesting, I did'nt realize about Maria-B's fortepianos. Does that come into Kirk's (yes,great) book?  I don't remember.  I suppose for all we know he may have  conceivably marked dynamics on his autograph manuscripts, as not a single one has been found. Incidently I think it's true that the orignal editions of the Beethoven sonatas (up to the pathetique) were described as for 'piano or harpsichord'!  Publishers way of drumming up trade, but even so...

Offline mikey6

  • PS Silver Member
  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1406
Re: Interpreting Scarlatti
Reply #5 on: March 12, 2006, 12:07:08 AM
I thought that 30 or so sonatas were published for performance on the forte piano?

Play him more like Chopin and that means haw you would pedal chopin, haw you woud use dynamics , rubato and phrasing in chopin. Its only my opinion.
I dunno if that's a good idea coz I always get told that my baroque interpretations are too romantic.  ie - to much rubato, too heavy.  Play him like a baroque composer, lighteness of touch, crystal clean clarity, lots of articulation. 
I'm learning k380 at the moment so any otehr helpful hints would be beneficial to me as well.  :)
Never look at the trombones. You'll only encourage them.
Richard Strauss
For more information about this topic, click search below!
 

Logo light pianostreet.com - the website for classical pianists, piano teachers, students and piano music enthusiasts.

Subscribe for unlimited access

Sign up

Follow us

Piano Street Digicert