Without wishing to presume the specific nature of the problem that the initiator of this thread perceives, I suggest that it may be to do with Sorabji reading rather than Sorabji playing. The pianist Jonathan Powell, for example, has reworked (for his own benefit) quite a few systems from scores of Sorabji piano pieces by reducing the number of staves (staffs if you're American!) that the composer himself and/or his publisher used, thereby making the passages concerned easier to read and, as a consequence, easier to learn to play. There are, of course, occasions when Sorabji's piano writing just has to be presented on three, four five or even six staves for the best compromised between legibility and intelligibility, but there are plenty more where the stave count need be no more than two or three. This music is often physically challenging enough as it is; anything that can be done to make it look less daunting to the intelligent pianist who is about to practise it can only be a good thing.
Best,
Alistair