Alexander Scriabin, sonata #10.Sergei Prokofiev, sonata #9 in C.
Why those?
The agile fingers she has will come in handy in Scriabin 10's trills.
Scriabin also had small hands, but wrote music that's complicated and beautiful. The 10th sonata would give chelsea's repetoire an added dimension. While it's not extremely complicated technically, it requires a lot of technical refinement to do the piece justice.Prokofiev's Mozart-like 9th is not terribly difficult, but is a wonderful piece that isn't played often. Playing it with beauty is a challenge that's about more than the typical definition of challenge which is the playing of pyrotechnics.Learning both pieces would provide two very different aspects of 20th century composition/performance, and neither is overplayed or so rare that audiences wouldn't be interested.
I think that the Berg looks pretty tedious to memorize, but that doesn't diminish its awesomeness.
Maybe some of the following:Ginastera: Tres Danzas ArgentinasGershwin: Rhapsody in Blue (solo version)....Handel: Any of the Suites
OK, I had my lesson today and this is the stuff I have been assigned for the summer:Scarlatti - a pair of Sonatas, my teacher had a photocopy of K39 in A major (Presto) waiting for me at my lesson, but it's up to me. She lent me a CD of them for ideas. On what criteria are sonatas paired?