I can't stand it, but I think that's because I'm Scottish. Too much exposure.
i'm scottish too but i love it.
Please explain to me what it is; I'm only a mere Scotsman myself...Best,Alistair
explian what celtic music is?path
jimmy shands nephew! wow. you're a star with me already thalbermad - but this does it. *guesses that jimmy plays bagpipes after hiking a few hills.
not a munroist? the scammer.
On a more serious note - your message footer - ""O music in thy depths we deposit our hearts and souls! You have taught us to see with our ears and hear with our hearts!!!" - where did you find this? I'll tell you why I'm interested to know if you can answer that...
since you said 'i feel he is not a munroist' did you deduce it by his short legs? even short legged scots can't help climbing all those hills.and, where in the world did alistair find the poet? how does one search for this? do you just type in the 'saying' and then voila the poet is there? i will now try this.
and, where in the world did alistair find the poet? how does one search for this? do you just type in the 'saying' and then voila the poet is there? i will now try this.
that's pretty good if the total number of hills is 30. thalbergmad, i'm bored today - and if i didn't get people in trouble - i'd say 'let's go climb one of those hills today.' it's raining here.
To "pathetiquegirl"...Please ignore my earlier request; I have found the source of that text now.Best,Alistair
oh really? where did you find it? tell me the source please. did you like the poem or something? path
As you will no doubt have discovered now, this is indeed what can be done to establish its source and and I wish I'd had the sense to do this several years ago before the 3-CD set of my string quintet was released (I set this as one of a number of texts by different authors in the finale of thie work and, in a move years ago before I'd got to that part of the piece, I lost all the notes on the texts and have never been able to recover them since - fortunately, I did not lose the texts themselves, or the score); it is accordingly credited in the liner notes as "unidentified - possibly Kahlil Gibran". As it happens, I remember correctly that it is by Gibran but what I'd forgotten (and have now found) is that it comes from his "The Voice of the Master", a copy of which I no longer possess. I now have only two other texts to identify in that piece...
oh ok so was i of any help? i found the quote off a cd.
3 cd set of your string quartet, ehh.
that must have been inexorably long.
alistair, what is the matter with you?
well, alistair, you do impress me because you know what you like and have definite ideas of how to write it down and express it. i like the five movements broken down into three and two movement sections (and the selection of instrumentation). and how you added soprano solo to the last. you sound very creative and certainly way above my musical level right now. maybe that is why you seem hard to understand sometimes - and yet, if i heard your music - i think i would understand your other 'problems' as genius related too.
well, alistair, you do impress me because you know what you like and have definite ideas of how to write it down and express it. i like the five movements broken down into three and two movement sections (and the selection of instrumentation). and how you added soprano solo to the last. you sound very creative and certainly way above my musical level right now.
(This is a P.S.)I hope I don't sound that way! The performance on that recording, I should have said earlier, is truly wonderful from all six of the musicians involved, from first note to last - and the recording is excellent, too...Best,Alistair
guess he doesn't count the soloist as an instrumentalist.
Me might appear to be thick, but how can there be 6 musicians if it is a quintet?is the other one serving the drinks or something, or do you have a substitute due to the length of the piece.Massive regards.Thalx
guess he doesn't count the soloist as an instrumentalist. maybe it's quintet with voice?
i like it when the vocalist has completely different material (no repetitions majorly) of the instrumental part. even if it sounds like the addition of another instrument - there's always a huge difference between the human voice and instruments.
just as with pianists - i think composers cannot be criticized or judged according to one person's aesthetics, but more over time by people who understand what motivated the music to be 'born.' what impetus that got it rolling. a combination of looking at the score and listening. you can't really follow some things without the score. and, yet, you can't get total feeling without shutting your eyes and listening to the music. i don't personally like to feel manipulated by music (hearing things that are unpleasant for long periods of time) and yet society does this to us all the time (cell phones, advertisements, etc) so i can see how intrusions play a huge part on the psyche of unsymmetrical ideas (such as the long and short movements). i tend to want to 'fix' things that don't look right. perhaps that is what keeps me from composing longer pieces. fixing too much and not seeing a bigger picture. realism has it's place, i guess. not sure what style of music you write, alistair, but am imagining it is similar to sorabji?