Gilels live rec from prague speed is the perfect tempo for me.
It depends on what you feel the movement to mean. I used to play it extremely fast, but my view of the movement has since changed. Previously, I saw it as a storm, a whirlwind, not unlike the last movement of 27/2; these days, however, I see it more as a lament and as a song (vocally speaking), in light of which I feel a fast tempo feels rather... stupid. But, tempo in this movement is above all an individual qestion.
I think that many concentrate too much on the excitement of the movement, and forget about the inherent expressivity that Beethoven has built in. The contours of the figurations suggest there is more to be said than just fast playing. In other words, I feel that there is a built in expressive melodic line within the accompaniment figures.
If it is really inherent it should come through no matter what the speed. Fast doesn't necessarily mean that subtlety is lost.
I don't think I understand your last statement, are you referring to inner voices (or lines)?
Some go slow on the third movement and some go fast. I personally like it faster because I feel it flows more. Slower just seems boring. What do you guys think?
I like it both ways to be honest. Rubi does it pretty fast, Arrau goes a bit slower, but I love both recordings.For me, speed isnt make or break with this piece.SJ
Let me tell you: the first version I ever listened to was Richter's. I loved it. A few weeks later, I got Arrau's recordings of the 32 piano sonatas, I went straight to Apassionata to find it was incredibly slower. The first thing that came to my mind was "why doesn't this guy wait till he masters a respectable tempo, and then record this sonata?", but now I got used to the slow version, and to tell you the truth, when I listen to Richter's I feel it lacks meaning. It's hard to explain, but I sense Arrau's to express certain emotions the faster version doesn't.