Home
Piano Music
Piano Music Library
Top composers »
Bach
Beethoven
Brahms
Chopin
Debussy
Grieg
Haydn
Mendelssohn
Mozart
Liszt
Prokofiev
Rachmaninoff
Ravel
Schubert
Schumann
Scriabin
All composers »
All composers
All pieces
Search pieces
Recommended Pieces
Audiovisual Study Tool
Instructive Editions
Recordings
PS Editions
Recent additions
Free piano sheet music
News & Articles
PS Magazine
News flash
New albums
Livestreams
Article index
Piano Forum
Resources
Music dictionary
E-books
Manuscripts
Links
Mobile
About
About PS
Help & FAQ
Contact
Forum rules
Pricing
Log in
Sign up
Piano Forum
Home
Help
Search
Piano Forum
»
Piano Board
»
Performance
»
Duchable on Technique (Pure) vs. Repertoire
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Down
Topic: Duchable on Technique (Pure) vs. Repertoire
(Read 1609 times)
dnephi
Sr. Member
Posts: 1859
Duchable on Technique (Pure) vs. Repertoire
on: November 07, 2006, 05:28:44 PM
Logged
For us musicians, the music of Beethoven is the pillar of fire and cloud of mist which guided the Israelites through the desert. (Roughly quoted, Franz Liszt.)
kempff1234
PS Silver Member
Full Member
Posts: 101
Re: Duchable on Technique (Pure) vs. Repertoire
Reply #1 on: November 07, 2006, 05:37:07 PM
I agree with the guy on some points and disagree on others. Certainly there are numerous pianists out there who can play with lots of emotion and stuff, yet they can't play the simplest passages in Haydn and Scarlatti. I personally tend to adopt the style of old masters such as Cortot, Rubinstein, Kempff,.... For me technique should be integrated into the process of learning a piece. I completely disagree with people who lock themselves up for hours, just playing apreggios and stuff. Ofcourse I have done that myself, yet I feel it is more important to deliver the message of the composer. Technique is just one of the many tools in doing so.
Other than that, I really like this guy.
Logged
Sign-up to post reply
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Up