Piano Forum

Poll

By keeping in mind that one needs a feminine touch in playing specifically classical music on the piano, who would be the best performers of Mozart, Beethoven?

Men
5 (62.5%)
Women
3 (37.5%)

Total Members Voted: 8

Voting closed: December 25, 2006, 01:09:26 PM

Topic: Classical performing art.  (Read 2392 times)

Offline andresdo

  • PS Silver Member
  • Newbie
  • ***
  • Posts: 15
Classical performing art.
on: November 25, 2006, 01:09:26 PM
Consider this deeply. I am a young man, (18) but I finished my grade 8 exam Cum Laude. Although I have many development-space left for touch to piano-keys, I feel generally that, amoungst professional players, women are the beter classical piano players i.e of Mozart etc. What do you say?
email me on devillierssenator@gmail.com

Offline Kassaa

  • PS Silver Member
  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1563
Re: Classical performing art.
Reply #1 on: November 25, 2006, 05:03:03 PM
The last thing you need for Beethoven is a feminine touch, and my favourite Mozart players are men.

Offline beethoven2

  • PS Silver Member
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 172
Re: Classical performing art.
Reply #2 on: November 25, 2006, 06:24:51 PM
i personally think, even though i'm a female, that the best concert pianists are male.

The last thing you need for Beethoven is a feminine touch

ahem...ahem...excuse me.
~__ />
 /\ /\        The Horsey ROCKS!! 

(curtosy of rach n bach)

Offline Kassaa

  • PS Silver Member
  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1563
Re: Classical performing art.
Reply #3 on: November 25, 2006, 07:40:08 PM
i personally think, even though i'm a female, that the best concert pianists are male.

ahem...ahem...excuse me.
Of course, you sometimes need a light and touching sound, but that has nothing to do with having a feminine touch.

Offline beethoven2

  • PS Silver Member
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 172
Re: Classical performing art.
Reply #4 on: November 25, 2006, 08:08:45 PM
Of course, you sometimes need a light and touching sound, but that has nothing to do with having a feminine touch.


you just haven't heard me play beethoven ;)
~__ />
 /\ /\        The Horsey ROCKS!! 

(curtosy of rach n bach)

Offline Kassaa

  • PS Silver Member
  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1563
Re: Classical performing art.
Reply #5 on: November 25, 2006, 08:19:04 PM
you just haven't heard me play beethoven ;)
And you haven't heard mine either!

Offline beethoven2

  • PS Silver Member
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 172
Re: Classical performing art.
Reply #6 on: November 25, 2006, 08:26:04 PM
Of course, you sometimes need a light and touching sound, but that has nothing to do with having a feminine touch.


i do agree with this.  it does have nothing to do with feminie touch.  some of the best recordings i have heard of the first mov. of moonlight are men. 

but if u r suggessting that women can't 'get into' beethoven's 'brutal'/fast/enticing/alluring/wonderful songs..............
~__ />
 /\ /\        The Horsey ROCKS!! 

(curtosy of rach n bach)

Offline Kassaa

  • PS Silver Member
  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1563
Re: Classical performing art.
Reply #7 on: November 25, 2006, 08:33:33 PM
i do agree with this.  it does have nothing to do with feminie touch.  some of the best recordings i have heard of the first mov. of moonlight are men. 

but if u r suggessting that women can't 'get into' beethoven's 'brutal'/fast/enticing/alluring/wonderful songs..............
Where did I say that? I consider Perahia's tone feminine for example, and I don't like him at all for any composer. Myra Hess, Clara Haskil (and Argerich, but haven't heard her playing any Beethoven sonata) are examples of women who don't have this unnecessary careful tone.

Offline beethoven2

  • PS Silver Member
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 172
Re: Classical performing art.
Reply #8 on: November 25, 2006, 08:45:42 PM
okay. i understand now what u mean.  i got to thinking to deep for myself. :)
~__ />
 /\ /\        The Horsey ROCKS!! 

(curtosy of rach n bach)

Offline pianistimo

  • PS Silver Member
  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 12142
Re: Classical performing art.
Reply #9 on: November 25, 2006, 10:01:34 PM
there are many great women artists that can do just fine without having to be compared by gender.  what if we had a stage where the curtains remained drawn.  would people be able to tell gender so well?  i thought idil biret was a man when i first heard her.  she has a lot of strength.  and, yet - she is female. 

why the arguments?  i don't see any.  we're both more similar than different.  a man always has some feminine parts and a woman - strength and endurance like a man.  in fact, some women are found to have more endurance than some men - although probably not as much strength.

who care?  i don't care.  nothing anybody on this forum could say - would make me think 'oh, it's hopeless - i'll never be able to play like a man.'   why would i want to play like a man?  we're all made differently.  can't we just appreciate each other? 

btw, there is nothing religious in this.  in fact, for me - i find it strange that there is LESS tolerance from those who propose that we all came from apes.  maybe it's a male hierarchichal thing.  men are better at everything .  ahahahahhaah  you are full of yourself, kassaa.

if anything - it is STILL a time factor for women.  women generally have both responsibilities at home and at work.  therefore less actual work hours (practice time) if they are juggling their own job, practice, children, cooking, cleaning,e tc.  and, to be realistic about it - it is very hard to be a concert artist, woman, mother, etc.  but it has been done.  same for women composers.  perhaps this is why many women and men artists prefer to be alone and not married?

somehow, i think personality enters the picture more than sex - in playing beethoven, mozart, and whatever else we are discussing.  also, interest.  if you play something many years - you become familiar with it's intricacies.  murray perahia has studied mozart much more deeply and complexly than most pianists who play mozart for 'fun.'

Offline pianistimo

  • PS Silver Member
  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 12142
Re: Classical performing art.
Reply #10 on: November 25, 2006, 10:10:03 PM
also, i don't buy into the theory that playing the piano takes a lot of strength.  it takes a lot of mental stamina and relaxation techniques.  otherwise you'll get carpal tunnels.  imo, women relax a bit better than most men - although not all.  i think i've heard a few guys play in an extremely meditative and relaxed state.  some want to 'pound.'

how about an even vote - the same for men and women?

Offline andresdo

  • PS Silver Member
  • Newbie
  • ***
  • Posts: 15
FROM THE GUY WHO SET THE QUESTION:
Reply #11 on: November 26, 2006, 12:51:38 PM
Hello there, forum users.

Thanks for the replies so far. Especially to Pianistimo! Also happy about Beethoven2's second message that says he'll think deeper about this..because the question is not so shallow as you think.

The question perhaps should be better explained. I asked: bearing in mind that we need a lot of feminine touch (that can be rephrased as a subtle and soft [pianissimo] touch) to play classical music on the piano, who would be the better professional performers of Mozart, Beethoven, etc?

The question is not set to down-play your opposite sex, but rather to give credit to the best players of the soft parts in the classical music-literature. I'm speciffically not concerned here with the forte-parts, as that is quite easy to do. But, we all know, that it's more difficult to play soft music, that is also technical. I asked some people who has their masters-degrees in music this same question, and it is indeed something to think about. Please vote.

Offline Kassaa

  • PS Silver Member
  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1563
Re: Classical performing art.
Reply #12 on: November 26, 2006, 05:12:47 PM
Hello there, forum users.

Thanks for the replies so far. Especially to Pianistimo! Also happy about Beethoven2's second message that says he'll think deeper about this..because the question is not so shallow as you think.

The question perhaps should be better explained. I asked: bearing in mind that we need a lot of feminine touch (that can be rephrased as a subtle and soft [pianissimo] touch) to play classical music on the piano, who would be the better professional performers of Mozart, Beethoven, etc?

The question is not set to down-play your opposite sex, but rather to give credit to the best players of the soft parts in the classical music-literature. I'm speciffically not concerned here with the forte-parts, as that is quite easy to do. But, we all know, that it's more difficult to play soft music, that is also technical. I asked some people who has their masters-degrees in music this same question, and it is indeed something to think about. Please vote.
Why do you consider subtle and soft feminine? Horowitz is an example of the most beautiful pianissimo you'll ever hear.

Also, I think when you have reached a certain level of pianism, playing forte is as difficult as playing piano, simply because you of often have an ugly tone when playing really loud.

Offline zheer

  • PS Silver Member
  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 2794
Re: Classical performing art.
Reply #13 on: November 26, 2006, 05:28:26 PM
  Looking through my classical music CD collection, it seems that not only are all the leading composers  men, but so are the leading pianists. Obviously women can play as well and even better than men, but the results do show that men are better than women in piano playing. i gess it's a little like asking are the french better in performing classical music than the polish, to answer this one needs to look at the results over the years.

   However things may change, for example who knew that the asians would make such outstanding pianists some 60-70 years ago.
" Nothing ends nicely, that's why it ends" - Tom Cruise -

Offline nightingale11

  • PS Silver Member
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 158
Re: Classical performing art.
Reply #14 on: November 26, 2006, 05:54:15 PM
Quote
  Looking through my classical music CD collection, it seems that not only are all the leading composers  men, but so are the leading pianists. Obviously women can play as well and even better than men, but the results do show that men are better than women in piano playing. i gess it's a little like asking are the french better in performing classical music than the polish, to answer this one needs to look at the results over the years.

I disagree. Sure I have no proof that that women and men are equally good at the piano but the reason why the majority of great composers were men is because of the society. Women in the 18-19th century were not ought to become great composers and pianists they would be a good wife. It's because of the society's look on women there are not many recorded great women composers/pianists in history.

Offline zheer

  • PS Silver Member
  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 2794
Re: Classical performing art.
Reply #15 on: November 26, 2006, 07:08:29 PM
I disagree.

  Disagree all you like, but for me it is male composers and pianists that i like the most. It is 2006 and what do we still have , Kissin, Lang Lang, yundi li ect ect. Am sur we also have great young female pianist but i honestly dont like them as pianists.
" Nothing ends nicely, that's why it ends" - Tom Cruise -
For more information about this topic, click search below!

Piano Street Magazine:
The Complete Piano Works of 16 Composers

Piano Street’s digital sheet music library is constantly growing. With the additions made during the past months, we now offer the complete solo piano works by sixteen of the most famous Classical, Romantic and Impressionist composers in the web’s most pianist friendly user interface. Read more
 

Logo light pianostreet.com - the website for classical pianists, piano teachers, students and piano music enthusiasts.

Subscribe for unlimited access

Sign up

Follow us

Piano Street Digicert