Piano Forum

Topic: Tonic, subdominant, submediant, etc.  (Read 8244 times)

Offline beethoven2

  • PS Silver Member
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 172
Tonic, subdominant, submediant, etc.
on: January 15, 2007, 10:02:45 PM
What is the point of things like the submediant, the subdominant, the tonic, the dominant, the mediant, and so forth?  When do you ever use them?  Why do they even matter?    ???
~__ />
 /\ /\        The Horsey ROCKS!! 

(curtosy of rach n bach)

Offline Bob

  • PS Silver Member
  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 16364
Re: Tonic, subdominant, submediant, etc.
Reply #1 on: January 16, 2007, 03:40:39 AM
Those are names given to chords.  They describe the chord's function.

That way you can compare the chords in different keys -- They still work the same way.
Favorite new teacher quote -- "You found the only possible wrong answer."

Offline pianistimo

  • PS Silver Member
  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 12142
Re: Tonic, subdominant, submediant, etc.
Reply #2 on: January 16, 2007, 03:50:40 AM
this article explains it in easy terms by comparing I, IV, V with the primary colors Red, Yellow, Blue.  https://everythingtrumpet.com/Bill-Adam/articles/FntHarmony.html

(the site works now)

Offline counterpoint

  • PS Silver Member
  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 2003
Re: Tonic, subdominant, submediant, etc.
Reply #3 on: January 16, 2007, 09:01:51 AM
It's a (to some extent religious) system, which claims, that all chords can be rooted back to only three chords. This system was intensively promoted by German musicologist Hugo Riemann (1849 - 1919)

tonica - triad on the 1st note of the scale (step I of the scale)

subdominant - triad a fifth below the tonica (step 4 of the scale)

dominant -  triad a fifth above tonica (step 5 of the scale)


Because there are often chords on the other steps of the scale as well, they are linked to the main functions as "parallel" or "mediant" chords.



If it doesn't work - try something different!

Offline pianistimo

  • PS Silver Member
  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 12142
Re: Tonic, subdominant, submediant, etc.
Reply #4 on: January 16, 2007, 06:39:31 PM
thanks for explaining that!

i always thought - after taking theory - that it was extremely helpful to see HOW composers composed.  if you don't learn about chord structure - you can be stuck forever trying to figure out one chord.  once you learn the system - it's easy.  you see that chords are made up of thirds (major and minor - and others like diminished and augmented) and that chords are figured quickly by counting every other letter of the musical alphabet starting with the lowest letter of of the chord.

sort of a musical sudoko or something.  you are arranging the tones in the order that will produce a chord (lowest third to highest).  once you analyze the chord and put it into the correct roman numeral  for the step that the tonic note of the chord is based on - then you can TRANSPOSE.

believe me, if i would have started as a child on this stuff - i would have been able to transpose a lot of music for my husband without writing it all down.  he sings baritone and nothing is in the right key for him with standard music.  you just write in all the roman numeral analysis - and boom - think of it in the next key you want.  play those chords - voila.

Offline invictious

  • PS Silver Member
  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1033
Re: Tonic, subdominant, submediant, etc.
Reply #5 on: January 17, 2007, 10:18:46 AM
Really, I don't mind learning theory, it's just those damned names!

Why can't we just call it 1 2 3 4 5 6 7  in respect to the key signature? it would have saved me 1 minute of my live remembering it.
Bach - Partita No.2
Scriabin - Etude 8/12
Debussy - L'isle Joyeuse
Liszt - Un Sospiro

Goal:
Prokofiev - Toccata

>LISTEN<

Offline prometheus

  • PS Silver Member
  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 3819
Re: Tonic, subdominant, submediant, etc.
Reply #6 on: January 18, 2007, 12:07:01 PM
You can. Many do. Depends on your education in music theory, if any.
"As an artist you don't rake in a million marks without performing some sacrifice on the Altar of Art." -Franz Liszt

Offline dark_chocolate

  • PS Silver Member
  • Newbie
  • ***
  • Posts: 16
Re: Tonic, subdominant, submediant, etc.
Reply #7 on: January 19, 2007, 12:06:33 PM
I found a weird question in my music theory book...' If the tonic is E minor..then what chord is B major?Tonic,subdominant or dominant?'.. ???...If the tonic is a minor chord is it possible that the dominant is a major chord?..and If the tonic is major chord is it possible that the dominant is a minor chord?thx a lot ;D

Offline pianistimo

  • PS Silver Member
  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 12142
Re: Tonic, subdominant, submediant, etc.
Reply #8 on: January 19, 2007, 06:20:10 PM
in a natural minor key, you simply write out all the notes of the scale first and then use the particular notes to make thirds that are part of the scale.

so if E minor is the tonic, it would be related to the scale 1 1/2 half steps above - which is G.  G major has one sharp.  F#.  so only the F's will be sharped.

i - E G B - minor - because you have minor third on the bottom and major third on top.
ii dim - F# A C  - diminished - both thirds are minor (between F# and A, and A and C)
III - G B D - major
iv - A C E - minor - minor third on bottom - major third on top
v - B D F# - minor - same reason
VI - C E G - major
VII- D F# A - major

now - if you fudge with making the minor scale harmonic or melodic - then you are effectively changing some of the chords.  whatever notes are changed in the scale are changed in the chords.

Offline counterpoint

  • PS Silver Member
  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 2003
Re: Tonic, subdominant, submediant, etc.
Reply #9 on: January 19, 2007, 07:01:18 PM
I found a weird question in my music theory book...' If the tonic is E minor..then what chord is B major?

The dominant chord is always a major chord, even if the third of this triad isn't part of the scale.

So the much more interesting question is:

what function does the B Minor chord have in E Minor key?

Normally there doesn't exist a B Minor chord in E Minor key. So you can only get it as a mediant chord to G (the tonica parallel chord).
If it doesn't work - try something different!

Offline preludium

  • PS Silver Member
  • Jr. Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 75
Re: Tonic, subdominant, submediant, etc.
Reply #10 on: January 19, 2007, 07:31:38 PM
what function does the B Minor chord have in E Minor key?

Normally there doesn't exist a B Minor chord in E Minor key.
Ahm sorry, no b minor chord (B - D - F#) in the e minor key?

All these dissections in mediants and stuff are exaggerated, in my opinion. It only really works for the major keys, so it is conceptually flawed. At the end of the day there are only two aspects in harmony: tension and resolution. Everything else is just an elusive variation. As one can see, in a minor key you already get in trouble with the most basic things, since the dominant is a minor chord, which is a contradiction. It doesn't get any better if you look at modal keys.

Offline counterpoint

  • PS Silver Member
  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 2003
Re: Tonic, subdominant, submediant, etc.
Reply #11 on: January 19, 2007, 09:29:00 PM
As one can see, in a minor key you already get in trouble with the most basic things,

I totally agree with what you say.

If it doesn't work - try something different!

Offline mad_max2024

  • PS Silver Member
  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 471
Re: Tonic, subdominant, submediant, etc.
Reply #12 on: January 19, 2007, 09:51:23 PM
I think most of the chaos around the discussion here comes from having several minor scales
If you use the natural minor, the v is minor (in Em that is the Bm chord)
If you use the harmonic minor, there is a major V (in Em that is the Bmaj chord)

I could be wrong since I've never actually harmonized anything in minor scales (or major ones for that matter) but when analysing I usually think of the V from the harmonic scale as dominant, so I would say yes, the dominant is major when the tonic is minor.

PS: I knew I had read it somewhere...
https://www.8notes.com/school/theory/composing_with_minor_scales.asp
This may help a bit...
I am perfectly normal, it is everyone else who is strange.

Offline mknueven

  • PS Silver Member
  • Jr. Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 70
Re: Tonic, subdominant, submediant, etc.
Reply #13 on: September 06, 2007, 12:04:42 AM
yes -that's what caused the confusion.
Not assuming it was a harmonic scale.

Offline counterpoint

  • PS Silver Member
  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 2003
Re: Tonic, subdominant, submediant, etc.
Reply #14 on: September 06, 2007, 07:54:16 AM
yes -that's what caused the confusion.
Not assuming it was a harmonic scale.


If we talk about chords, we don't talk about scales.

The invention of different Minor scales is the most confusing thing in music theory.

I never saw a piece that was composed in (let's say) C Minor harmonic or in C Minor melodic. If the piece is in C Minor, it is in C Minor. There are no different Minors! (Except from the Greek modes, which are also used in Jazz music).
If it doesn't work - try something different!

Offline term

  • PS Silver Member
  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 493
Re: Tonic, subdominant, submediant, etc.
Reply #15 on: September 06, 2007, 08:00:01 AM
It's a (to some extent religious) system
true.
I'm agnostic, but in this case atheist.  ;D
"Wise men talk because they have something to say; fools talk because they have to say something." - Plato
"The only truth lies in learning to free ourselves from insane passion for the truth" - Eco

Offline mcgillcomposer

  • PS Silver Member
  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 839
Re: Tonic, subdominant, submediant, etc.
Reply #16 on: September 13, 2007, 10:05:12 AM
Those are names given to chords.  They describe the chord's function.

That way you can compare the chords in different keys -- They still work the same way.

Even more fundamentally, they refer to scale degrees. There is a very logical explanation for this and you can find it in almost any harmony text. It is too tedious to reproduce here, but it is discussed in the following, and more:

Alan Forte's book on harmony
Charles Rosen's book on the classical style
Roger Sessions' book on harmony
Asked if he had ever conducted any Stockhausen,Sir Thomas Beecham replied, "No, but I once trod in some."
For more information about this topic, click search below!
 

Logo light pianostreet.com - the website for classical pianists, piano teachers, students and piano music enthusiasts.

Subscribe for unlimited access

Sign up

Follow us

Piano Street Digicert