Home
Piano Music
Piano Music Library
Audiovisual Study Tool
Search pieces
All composers
Top composers »
Bach
Beethoven
Brahms
Chopin
Debussy
Grieg
Haydn
Mendelssohn
Mozart
Liszt
Prokofiev
Rachmaninoff
Ravel
Schubert
Schumann
Scriabin
All composers »
All pieces
Recommended Pieces
PS Editions
Instructive Editions
Recordings
Recent additions
Free piano sheet music
News & Articles
PS Magazine
News flash
New albums
Livestreams
Article index
Piano Forum
Resources
Music dictionary
E-books
Manuscripts
Links
Mobile
About
About PS
Help & FAQ
Contact
Forum rules
Pricing
Log in
Sign up
Piano Forum
Home
Help
Search
Piano Forum
»
Piano Board
»
Miscellaneous
»
Songs
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Down
Topic: Songs
(Read 1545 times)
dazed
PS Silver Member
Newbie
Posts: 12
Songs
on: January 20, 2007, 01:33:36 AM
I've come back to the piano after about 30 years of career, mariage, kids etc; only to find that everythig seems to be called a "song"; "Rach III - yeah I know that song". Either I'm getting old or iPod simplifications are taking over...?
Logged
will
PS Silver Member
Sr. Member
Posts: 252
Re: Songs
Reply #1 on: January 20, 2007, 02:33:02 AM
Check out
https://www.pianostreet.com/smf/index.php/topic,10246.0.html
and
https://www.pianostreet.com/smf/index.php/topic,6065.0.html
Logged
dazed
PS Silver Member
Newbie
Posts: 12
Re: Songs
Reply #2 on: January 20, 2007, 12:51:21 PM
Ta - not just me being a miserable old git then.
Logged
ahinton
PS Silver Member
Sr. Member
Posts: 12149
Re: Songs
Reply #3 on: January 20, 2007, 03:56:03 PM
As most contributors here so far have already agreed, “song” when physical singing is required of a singer (except, of course, in a operatic context) and “piece” or “work” or some other description when only instrumental playing is involved. That said, let us not forget, among other things,
(a)
l’Art du Chant Appliqué au Piano
(b) Sorabji’s remark that “music begins and ends with singing”
(c) the observation credited to Byrd centuries earlier that “Since singing so good a thing / I wish all men would learn to sing” (which Sorabji used to pervert as “Since singing is so hard a thing / I most all men and women would learn to shut up and recognise that it takes years of intensive practice and physical development even to arrive at the threshold of fine singing” – which, of course, scans far less well than Byrd’s more concise remark but is arguably no less pertinent) and
(d) Sorabji’s advice to Geoffrey Douglas Madge on the afternoon before his first complete performance of what is probably still today the composer’s best-known (or at least most-discussed) work with the words “think of
Opus Clavicembalisticum
as a song”.
The finest and highest aspects of a singer’s art are surely of importance to most if not all instrumentalists. This fact - and all of the above - does not, however, excuse the application of the term “song” to works that are not, of themselves “songs”, even if their performance does call for a good understanding of what it is to sing. Again, to quote Sorabji: “I had singing lessons when I was a boy. I had a voice like a crow. But at least I learnt from this – and from great singers – something of what it is to sing, even though I could not do it myself”.
Best,
Alistair
Logged
Alistair Hinton
Curator / Director
The Sorabji Archive
Sign-up to post reply
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Up
For more information about this topic, click search below!
Search on Piano Street