Piano Forum

Topic: Abbreviated theory notations  (Read 2699 times)

Offline keyofc

  • PS Silver Member
  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 635
Abbreviated theory notations
on: May 15, 2007, 09:11:38 PM
I'm finally working on the Moonlight Sonata Movement 3
and I am not a classical junkie.

I was wondering do any of you have different ways of notating movements to make them easier to remember?

For example -
in 1st measure -I would write C#/G instead of the roman numeral - but then how do you notate it's going up to the next c# before that arpeggio is finished?

Or for example,, measure 5, third group of notes, do you have your own way of notating it to remind yourself it's starting on the third and going down to the G#?

I think it would be a lot easier to memorize if there were standard ways for notating these differences.   or perhaps there are and I just don't know about them?

Offline jlh

  • PS Silver Member
  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 2352
Re: Abbreviated theory notations
Reply #1 on: May 15, 2007, 09:38:25 PM
I'm finally working on the Moonlight Sonata Movement 3
and I am not a classical junkie.

I was wondering do any of you have different ways of notating movements to make them easier to remember?

For example -
in 1st measure -I would write C#/G instead of the roman numeral - but then how do you notate it's going up to the next c# before that arpeggio is finished?

Or for example,, measure 5, third group of notes, do you have your own way of notating it to remind yourself it's starting on the third and going down to the G#?

I think it would be a lot easier to memorize if there were standard ways for notating these differences.   or perhaps there are and I just don't know about them?

You have to look at larger groupings of notes.  You're reducing it to single notes where there is a definite grouping of at least 3 notes.  For the first measure, just think of it in the RH as arpeggios on a C# min 2nd inv. (or C#m/G#).

I think the music score itself is a pretty standard way of notating differences like this...  ;)
. ROFL : ROFL:LOL:ROFL : ROFL '
                 ___/\___
  L   ______/             \
LOL "”””””””\         [ ] \
  L              \_________)
                 ___I___I___/

Offline keyofc

  • PS Silver Member
  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 635
Re: Abbreviated theory notations
Reply #2 on: May 16, 2007, 11:57:51 PM
thanks jl,
I don't have a problem reading music, but I have a problem with remembering it (unless I learned by ear or, of course, wrote it myself)

I guess its something like note-taking - everyone has their own way of doing it to help them memorize.

If I was going to try to go over it (jot it down) before I play something, I would write it as an outline.

There are some movements that need to be defined more specifically to have it memorized correctly. 

<Maybe no one else writes themselves out a shorthand version)

But if anyone does - please let me know.

Offline timothy42b

  • PS Silver Member
  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 3414
Re: Abbreviated theory notations
Reply #3 on: May 17, 2007, 06:15:18 AM
No, I think you're on to something. 

There are methods that make memorizing some items much easier.  Usually they involve prememorizing some kind of set of rules, then adapting the new list to it.  A good starting point is that memory book by ........ oh shoot, my memory has failed, but it's one of the standard ones, co-written with Jerry Lucas the basketball player. 

At any rate, in memory contests there are standard tests.  One is being given a shuffled deck of cards and memorizing the complete order, fastest time wins.  (always under 60 seconds, winners usually around 40 - 45 seconds.)  They have systems or they couldn't do this kind of stunt. 

There are similar methods for long digit numbers, for faces, etc.  I haven't seen much specifically for music - that's why I asked the SATB question recently. 

My kids don't use memory tricks and they laugh at me when, for example, I construct mental images to remember the  number of my spot in the parking ramp.  They don't need them at their age, and young pianists probably don't either.  I do. 
Tim

Offline mknueven

  • PS Silver Member
  • Jr. Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 70
Re: Abbreviated theory notations
Reply #4 on: August 28, 2007, 08:30:50 PM
Thanks Tim-
yes, I need them too! :)
For more information about this topic, click search below!
 

Logo light pianostreet.com - the website for classical pianists, piano teachers, students and piano music enthusiasts.

Subscribe for unlimited access

Sign up

Follow us

Piano Street Digicert