What if you have (for example) 6 students who meet the criteria in a month? How will you decide who gets it? Furthermore, what if you choose one, and the next month he does the same amount of work (or more), but you choose someone else? Would that not then be de-motivating?
Scholarships I think are for students with financial need who are willing to work hard, and should be reserved for special cases.
because it would impact you financially - and you are one person relying on a fixed income (at least for the piano lessons) - i wouldn't. but, if you belonged to a music school - it might be less burden to you personally.
why not do smaller prizes. keep the 'piano bucks' idea - and award pencils and stuff that don't cost much (although, i'm wondering lately if only the dollar store is where you can find this without hurting the budget, too).
do you ever sew, mayla? i was tempted to just make some gifts, too, for around the holidays and award them to students. for instance, you can make music bags (burlap -or heavy fabric) and help students become organized by making a place for pencils, etc.
I could see something about "tuition scholarship" if a family is finanacially strapped and the kid is really talented.But you're also talking about throwing away that amount of money each month. It will add up. Two a month is 24 a year. That could a week or so of teaching you'd be doing with no financial payback. I would pass on that.I'm thinking they're paying you. If they get a lot better, then they and you have done your job. It doesn't mean they've earned a free pass. You can always highlight their achievements in other ways -- harder pieces on the recital, a medal, etc. Give them a title. Make an announcement at the concert of how proud you are of how much they've accomplished during the past year. "And now here is the kid I've been praising just now, who now has a lot more pressure to play really well because of all the priase I just heaped on him...."
My first teacher awarded 'points' for a good lesson. You could win a whole point if you had a great lesson, or fractions of a point for less good lessons. I remember once I even got an eighth of a point! (It was a sticker with an eighth note on it, no less ). When you got to 20 points, you won a statuette of a composer. You don't have to do the same thing, but it's a good motivator that's also limited in the cost to you. No matter how hard a student works, they can only earn a prize every 20 lessons, which means that you won't constantly be spending your money on prizes.If I were you, I would do that way before just giving away lessons. Save the free lessons for when there are errors in your billing/payments.
I just don't think a kid is going to be motivated by getting an extra lesson. They don't really get anything. The parents save money on that lesson.
And then it pits students against each other. They would be competing against each other.I could see giving out a small prize or the title "most practice minutes this week" or something like that.
I like the points system idea a lot better. It pushes the students on their own, against themself. It is extrinsic though.