Piano Forum

Topic: Pieces that don't look hard but are  (Read 3529 times)

Offline alpacinator1

  • PS Silver Member
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 197
Pieces that don't look hard but are
on: November 04, 2007, 02:12:45 AM
Well, I just had a few experiences and I thought I'd make a topic on it.

With some pieces, when you first look at the notes, they don't look particularly challenging. But then, when you actually try to play them, you find that they are.

For example, Saltarelle op. 23 by Alkan. I am an intermediate-level pianist, and when I saw the notes, I thought "I can play this". Then, I tried it and realized the notes literally force your fingers to jump on top of eachother, and they practically fell off.

Another song like this is Chopin's Minute Waltz. The notes don't look all that difficult, but the song is played extremely fast, and it is actually VERY hard (too much so for me to play, anyway)

So, what are some other pieces that look easy to play but aren't?
Working on:
Beethoven - Waldstein Sonata
Bach - C minor WTC I
Liszt - Liebestraume no. 3
Chopin - etude 25-12

Offline leonidas

  • PS Silver Member
  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 381
Re: Pieces that don't look hard but are
Reply #1 on: November 04, 2007, 02:48:15 AM
Every piece looks relatively easy before you see the metronome marking.



Ist thou hairy?  Nevermore - quoth the shaven-haven.

Offline clhiospzitn

  • PS Silver Member
  • Jr. Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 33
Re: Pieces that don't look hard but are
Reply #2 on: November 04, 2007, 03:23:12 AM
Believe it or not, I thought Liszt's Transcendental Etude no. 7 (Eroica) looked somewhat manageable when I first saw it (at least compared to the other etudes), but it turned out to be a lot more challenging than I expected.  The octaves section is a killer.

Some of Beethoven's, Haydn's, and Mozart's sonatas look pretty easy, but are actually just the opposite.  For some reason I tend to have more problems playing these three composers' works than with other ones.

"After silence, that which comes nearest to expressing the inexpressible is music." - Aldous Huxley

Offline gyzzzmo

  • PS Silver Member
  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 2209
Re: Pieces that don't look hard but are
Reply #3 on: November 04, 2007, 06:52:40 AM
Many of the Chopin Nocturnes. Often they have technical peaks in them wich makes them difficult to really get them ready to performance level.
1+1=11

Offline invictious

  • PS Silver Member
  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1033
Re: Pieces that don't look hard but are
Reply #4 on: November 04, 2007, 09:25:13 AM
Every piece looks relatively easy before you see the metronome marking.





Another random al pacino pic in a thread AGAIN/


Well, true. Even Scriabin's 7thor 8th sonata can look really easy until you realize the speed.
Bach - Partita No.2
Scriabin - Etude 8/12
Debussy - L'isle Joyeuse
Liszt - Un Sospiro

Goal:
Prokofiev - Toccata

>LISTEN<

Offline chopininov

  • PS Silver Member
  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 313
Re: Pieces that don't look hard but are
Reply #5 on: November 04, 2007, 09:33:38 AM
I'd have to say Alkan's Grand Sonate "Les Quatre Ages" Op. 33. When I saw the first movement, looked pretty easy. But of course it wasn't.
Some cause happiness wherever they go; others whenever they go.

Offline pianovirus

  • PS Silver Member
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 212
Re: Pieces that don't look hard but are
Reply #6 on: November 04, 2007, 11:31:02 AM
Schubert. I think this would apply to most of his piano works.
youtube.com/user/pianovirus[/url]

Offline klavierkonzerte

  • PS Silver Member
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 210
Re: Pieces that don't look hard but are
Reply #7 on: November 04, 2007, 11:51:10 AM
most of schumanns piano music are WAY harder than they look or sounds and not because of the speed but because of his awkward writing
i find his music, somtimes, more difficult to pull off convincingly than some of liszt flashy pieces.

Offline prongated

  • PS Silver Member
  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 817
Re: Pieces that don't look hard but are
Reply #8 on: November 04, 2007, 12:11:32 PM
Schumann's Toccata op. 7 is apparently really hard. Having never sight-read the score, a quick peek reveals nothing more than a behemoth octavian-plus Feux Follets look-alike. Which doesn't look that hard ;D

Offline cloches_de_geneve

  • PS Silver Member
  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 439
Re: Pieces that don't look hard but are
Reply #9 on: November 04, 2007, 12:49:53 PM
Schubert. I think this would apply to most of his piano works.

I second that. Especially his last six sonatas, not just because they are difficult, but also because you need to keep up the stamina for close to 40 minutes  :P
"It's true that I've driven through a number of red lights on occasion, but on the other hand I've stopped at a lot of green ones but never gotten credit for it." -- Glenn Gould

Offline gyzzzmo

  • PS Silver Member
  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 2209
Re: Pieces that don't look hard but are
Reply #10 on: November 04, 2007, 01:56:31 PM
I second that. Especially his last six sonatas, not just because they are difficult, but also because you need to keep up the stamina for close to 40 minutes  :P

I cant third that, somehow schubert is for me typically a composer with no unsuspected technical difficulties :S
1+1=11

Offline hodi

  • PS Silver Member
  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 848
Re: Pieces that don't look hard but are
Reply #11 on: November 04, 2007, 06:30:06 PM
I cant third that, somehow schubert is for me typically a composer with no unsuspected technical difficulties :S

try his wanderer fantasy  ;D

Offline thalberg

  • PS Silver Member
  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1950
Re: Pieces that don't look hard but are
Reply #12 on: November 04, 2007, 08:12:00 PM
Goldberg Variations.  Fiercely difficult, yet you look at the page and it doesn't look bad at all. 

Offline gyzzzmo

  • PS Silver Member
  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 2209
Re: Pieces that don't look hard but are
Reply #13 on: November 04, 2007, 08:37:56 PM
try his wanderer fantasy  ;D
Ill have a (long) look lol, havent played it yet :p. Btw, cant say either that i thought that 'der wanderer' would be easy :p
1+1=11

Offline soliloquy

  • PS Silver Member
  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1464
Re: Pieces that don't look hard but are
Reply #14 on: November 04, 2007, 09:23:33 PM
La Campanella I think is the most famous for this :)

Offline pianogeek_cz

  • PS Silver Member
  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 448
Re: Pieces that don't look hard but are
Reply #15 on: November 04, 2007, 09:27:08 PM
Quite some Brahms would fall in this category... notably the recently mentioned Scherzo op. 4.
Be'ein Tachbulot Yipol Am Veteshua Berov Yoetz (Without cunning a nation shall fall,  Salvation Come By Many Good Counsels)

Offline verywellmister

  • PS Silver Member
  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 283
Re: Pieces that don't look hard but are
Reply #16 on: November 06, 2007, 01:51:51 AM
Suggestion Diabolique, while not as hard as it sounds, looks fairly manageble on paper, is actually quite tough.
(\_/)
(O.o)
(> <)

This is Bunny. Copy Bunny into your signature to help him on his way to world domination

i thought i heard my washing machine playing Ondine

Offline thaicheow

  • PS Silver Member
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 114
Re: Pieces that don't look hard but are
Reply #17 on: November 06, 2007, 01:12:16 PM
Some may not agree, but I think any pieces by Mozart applicalble to this catergory. Most work by JS Bach too.

Offline soderlund

  • PS Silver Member
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 126
Re: Pieces that don't look hard but are
Reply #18 on: November 06, 2007, 06:52:54 PM
I think the mazurkas by Chopin are really hard to play well. I am struggling with one of the easiest, I think. Op. 17 no. 2 in E minor. It's really hard to play well, obviously not because of technical difficulties. It's either too blurry or too harsh.  :(

Offline dnephi

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1859
Re: Pieces that don't look hard but are
Reply #19 on: November 06, 2007, 07:48:16 PM
Brahms
For us musicians, the music of Beethoven is the pillar of fire and cloud of mist which guided the Israelites through the desert.  (Roughly quoted, Franz Liszt.)

Offline Nightscape

  • PS Silver Member
  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 784
Re: Pieces that don't look hard but are
Reply #20 on: November 06, 2007, 08:03:10 PM
Anything by John Adams or Steve Reich looks a lot harder than it appears and requires a lot of concentration to play.

Offline retrouvailles

  • PS Silver Member
  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 2851
Re: Pieces that don't look hard but are
Reply #21 on: November 06, 2007, 08:12:43 PM
Anything by John Adams or Steve Reich looks a lot harder than it appears and requires a lot of concentration to play.

I'll second that. It is sooo easy to get lost in a long and complicated piece like Phrygian Gates, which doesn't really look bad until you sit down at the piano.

Offline pianogeek_cz

  • PS Silver Member
  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 448
Re: Pieces that don't look hard but are
Reply #22 on: November 07, 2007, 03:51:03 PM
Suggestion Diabolique, while not as hard as it sounds, looks fairly manageble on paper, is actually quite tough.

As is the case with almost all Prokofiev.
Be'ein Tachbulot Yipol Am Veteshua Berov Yoetz (Without cunning a nation shall fall,  Salvation Come By Many Good Counsels)

Offline bob3.1415926

  • PS Silver Member
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 144
Re: Pieces that don't look hard but are
Reply #23 on: November 07, 2007, 05:07:24 PM
As is the case with almost all Prokofiev.
I'll second that. It doesn't half sound great though.

Offline slobone

  • PS Silver Member
  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1059
Re: Pieces that don't look hard but are
Reply #24 on: November 08, 2007, 06:56:49 PM
Schubert. I think this would apply to most of his piano works.


I'll agree with that. Even the Moments Musicaux, which sound like children's pieces until you try to play them...

BTW, Schubert wasn't that great a piano player. He couldn't even play his own Wanderer Fantasy. So why did he feel he had to torture accompanists with the Erlkoenig?

Offline chopininov

  • PS Silver Member
  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 313
Re: Pieces that don't look hard but are
Reply #25 on: November 08, 2007, 10:27:16 PM
I'll agree with that. Even the Moments Musicaux, which sound like children's pieces until you try to play them...

BTW, Schubert wasn't that great a piano player. He couldn't even play his own Wanderer Fantasy. So why did he feel he had to torture accompanists with the Erlkoenig?
??? The Earl King is easy--the accompaniment part is, at least. I can understand if you meant this about Liszt's transcription of it, though.
Some cause happiness wherever they go; others whenever they go.

Offline stringoverstrung

  • PS Silver Member
  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 293
Re: Pieces that don't look hard but are
Reply #26 on: November 09, 2007, 08:01:34 PM
definitely brahms

Offline mike_lang

  • PS Silver Member
  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1496
Re: Pieces that don't look hard but are
Reply #27 on: November 09, 2007, 08:03:12 PM
??? The Earl King is easy--the accompaniment part is, at least. I can understand if you meant this about Liszt's transcription of it, though.

Yes - Gerald Moore split the octaves between the hands whenever possible, which significantly facilitates it.

Offline slobone

  • PS Silver Member
  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1059
Re: Pieces that don't look hard but are
Reply #28 on: November 10, 2007, 03:25:07 AM
??? The Earl King is easy--the accompaniment part is, at least. I can understand if you meant this about Liszt's transcription of it, though.

Ow, my right hand hurts. Especially if the singer wants to do it over and over.

Course the voice part's no picnic either.

Offline slobone

  • PS Silver Member
  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1059
Re: Pieces that don't look hard but are
Reply #29 on: November 10, 2007, 03:27:42 AM
Some may not agree, but I think any pieces by Mozart applicalble to this catergory. Most work by JS Bach too.

I certainly agree with Bach. Many of his pieces do sound easy till you try to play them.

But the key to Bach is fingering. Once you've mastered that, it's not too bad.

Offline fnork

  • PS Silver Member
  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 733
Re: Pieces that don't look hard but are
Reply #30 on: November 17, 2007, 05:20:51 PM
How about Brahms op 119 which I'm learning now. Not so hard to sightread but once you start really working on them, you notice that you need very good control over your instrument to bring out all of the different textures. the first intermezzo is sightreadable but NOT easy to perform well....

Offline gerry

  • PS Silver Member
  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 658
Re: Pieces that don't look hard but are
Reply #31 on: November 17, 2007, 06:07:55 PM
A great deal of Schumann appears on the surface to be playable until you realize that he engages every finger playing inner melodies, ascending an descending lines, sustained inner notes, not to mention the intellectual games, i.e. playing with letters of the alphabet, his imaginary Eusebius and Florestan, etc.
Durch alle Töne tönet
Im bunten Erdentraum
Ein leiser Ton gezogen
Für den, der heimlich lauschet.
For more information about this topic, click search below!
 

Logo light pianostreet.com - the website for classical pianists, piano teachers, students and piano music enthusiasts.

Subscribe for unlimited access

Sign up

Follow us

Piano Street Digicert