Home
Piano Music
Piano Music Library
Top composers »
Bach
Beethoven
Brahms
Chopin
Debussy
Grieg
Haydn
Mendelssohn
Mozart
Liszt
Prokofiev
Rachmaninoff
Ravel
Schubert
Schumann
Scriabin
All composers »
All composers
All pieces
Search pieces
Recommended Pieces
Audiovisual Study Tool
Instructive Editions
Recordings
PS Editions
Recent additions
Free piano sheet music
News & Articles
PS Magazine
News flash
New albums
Livestreams
Article index
Piano Forum
Resources
Music dictionary
E-books
Manuscripts
Links
Mobile
About
About PS
Help & FAQ
Contact
Forum rules
Pricing
Log in
Sign up
Piano Forum
Home
Help
Search
Piano Forum
»
Piano Board
»
Student's Corner
»
Is half learning pieces detrimental to technique?
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Down
Topic: Is half learning pieces detrimental to technique?
(Read 1255 times)
bob3.1415926
PS Silver Member
Full Member
Posts: 144
Is half learning pieces detrimental to technique?
on: November 07, 2007, 01:07:17 PM
In an effort to sort out my technique, I decided to try and cover Chopin Op.10 (complete) in a year. I'm doing this by running 2 etudes at a time for 2 months, then dropping them and moving on.
Currently I am in month 5, so have played with, and dropped etudes 1 & 12, then 2 & 11, and am currently learning 3 & 10. (I thought stepping inwards had some aesthetic appeal.)
Obviously in only two months they haven't been anywhere near concert standard. They have been mostly close to or at full speed (with the exception of No.2 which was a long way off) but with quite a lot of errors when played that fast. I worry that not spending the time polishing them to a great standard could be damaging my ability to do exactly that (which is kind one of my weaknesses).
That said, it does seem to be doing wonders for my playing abilities. Everything seems to be rapidly getting easier.
So it is obviously doing some good, but I worry there could be negative repercussions. Any thoughts?
Logged
dan101
PS Silver Member
Sr. Member
Posts: 439
Re: Is half learning pieces detrimental to technique?
Reply #1 on: November 07, 2007, 03:19:29 PM
If you're seeing results in terms of increased finger dexterity, etc... then you're on the right track. You are not damaging your pianistic abilities in any way.
However, I would strongly suggest properly learning your favorite etude(s). Sticking with something until it's learned from memory teaches you patience and enhances your mental stamina and determination. This is all part of the package of becoming a successful musician.
Good luck.
Logged
Daniel E. Friedman, owner of
www.musicmasterstudios.com
[/url]
You CAN learn to play the piano and compose in a fun and effective way.
slobone
PS Silver Member
Sr. Member
Posts: 1059
Re: Is half learning pieces detrimental to technique?
Reply #2 on: November 08, 2007, 06:36:59 PM
I don't think it's necessarily essential for an amateur to play pieces up to concert speed. I DO think it's necessary to learn to play them without mistakes!
If you're only making an occasional mistake, it's not worth obsessing about -- even professionals do that. But if your performance is littered with wrong notes, definitely stop and fix them before you go on to a new piece.
On a deeper level, I see you and I have different goals for our practicing time. I'm less interested in teaching my fingers new tricks than I am in making music, and that only really starts after the notes have been learned.
If you treat the Chopin Etudes just as finger exercises whose musical qualities are unimportant, I can only wonder -- what pieces will you take more seriously? What exactly are you preparing yourself for?
Logged
Sign-up to post reply
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Up