An additional note: when I first heard this piece, I wasn't a fan of it. As a matter of fact, I didn't really like it that much at all. But I found it exceptionally fascinating in a way I couldn't exactly describe. After listening to it about two more times, I discovered the ways Busoni used his themes, and weaves them in and out of the movements in the most creative of places, often in ways that one will not notice unless they have a great deal of familiarity with the piece. Since then, I've listened to the entire piece many times and I am still discovering little things about it that I hadn't noticed before. This is largely part of the enjoyment I get out of the piece.Have others had a similar experience?
It took me a looong time to get to grips with it. It's such a complex work, and can't be digested in under 6 hearings. And a score is essential. After a days work on it, I can say it isn't as bad as I imagined...Busoni was of course an amazing pianist, and really knew how to write for it, so it fits perfectly under the hand. It's just so complicated you have to sped ages working it all out. I think the orchestral playing in the Hamelin recording is fantastic, it's so clean. The live video of Hamelin playing it on "it's all about the music (cough fingers)" dvd is to fast, and sounds a little messy...but I think thats the orchestra's fault more than Hamelin's.
Yes, this is one Concerto that Mr Midi does play exceedingly well.Shame he did not do the same for Rubinstein 4.Thal