Piano Forum

Book: Reading Franz Liszt
Pianist Paul Roberts’ latest book “Reading Franz Liszt” invites readers into Liszt’s world through an engaging examination of his most cherished compositions and the underlying literary works that influenced them. Exploring the depths of Franz Liszt’s legacy, Roberts presents a fresh perspective on the legendary composer, emphasizing his poetic sensitivity alongside his technical prowess. Read more >>

Topic: Richard Clayderman  (Read 3040 times)

Offline aileigc

  • PS Silver Member
  • Newbie
  • ***
  • Posts: 24
Richard Clayderman
on: May 03, 2004, 01:51:38 PM
I have a book by Richard Clayderman, and looking at it, it seems that he has simplified some pieces (I'm not sure, but I even think he has _altered_ Schubert's serenade, putting in one of those boring arpeggios that always appear in this kind of music: Love Story, Ballade Pour Adeline). Is he a good pianist at all, or has he simplied what he plays ? I mean, is he really concert level or has he become only an entertaining pianist with a light-romantic feel similar (something like piano's Julio Iglesias) ?


P.S.: I tend to think he's one of those cases with huge success without much merit, like fast-selling writers.

Offline Clare

  • PS Silver Member
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 236
Re: Richard Clayderman
Reply #1 on: May 04, 2004, 08:03:03 AM
I think he's a bit more of the latter, i.e. like Julio Iglesias.
I aint got no love for the guy.

Offline comme_le_vent

  • PS Silver Member
  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 792
Re: Richard Clayderman
Reply #2 on: May 05, 2004, 02:16:49 PM
clayderman hasnt got the worst technique in the world, and id imagine he has had some good teaching.

its just really strange how his recordings just make him sound like a total idiot.

albeit a rich idiot.

Great artists aim for perfection, while knowing that perfection itself is impossible, it is the driving force for them to be the best they can be - MC Hammer


  • Guest
Re: Richard Clayderman
Reply #3 on: May 23, 2004, 07:34:34 AM
Personally, I think R. Clayderman does a total "Bastardization" of famous concertos, what a poop head.  Like Rach 2's concerto, he jumps right into the 3rd movement after the largo 1st movement chords then adds drums with the orchastra, what a gong show.
His modern stuff is okay, but still he's no Horowitz.
For more information about this topic, click search below!

Logo light pianostreet.com - the website for classical pianists, piano teachers, students and piano music enthusiasts.

Subscribe for unlimited access

Sign up

Follow us

Piano Street Digicert