do u think that scarlatti sonata is better??they can increase my skill better?i am kinda regret b4 a few years i was too lazy to play piano dunno if i can play better:(
where can i find Scarlatti's Sonatas??www.sheetmusicachives.com only has about 150 of his only..
Thanks...By the way, are there any websites i can download Scarlatti's recordings?thanks...
My own view is that, as my musical consciousness is very special to me, to play, write or study things, even exercises, which are essentially programmable, homogeneous patterns is a waste of my mind and fingers - life is just too short.I like to be surprised and charmed by the uniqueness of a work. I like a work to springboard my musical impulse into new regions. If patterns and homogeneity begin to dominate my improvisation, for instance, it's time I put the piano aside for a few hours and did some gardening.Also, a work worthy of serious study must offer me new things to think about over the years. Just repeating it in the same old way month after month holds no interest for me no matter how technically well I can play it. What do you do with Czerny's pieces once you have them under your belt ? I played his study in thirds (the on in C) once. Then I learned Chopin's (in G# minor). The latter is a constant joy to play, even as a warm-up, because each day I find a new way of feeling a phrase, a rhythm. Even when I did play Czerny's I was constantly playing the right hand in a different key, breaking the rhythm up, swinging it....anything to get rid of the homogeneity. I'm sure Czerny was a very sincere man who contributed enormously to piano playing in general, but music ? No, perhaps I'm missing something but I can't see it myself.