Piano Forum

Topic: Chamber music  (Read 1887 times)

Offline russda_man

  • PS Silver Member
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 119
Chamber music
on: June 02, 2008, 11:42:02 AM
I'm getting some instruments together to form a piano quartet or quintet. I am looking for some music. I've never tried chamber music before, so I'm not up on the repertoire. Does anyone have any suggestions? Someone said Beethoven and Mendelsohn are good. Thanks.
Russ.   

Offline faulty_damper

  • PS Silver Member
  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 3929
Re: Chamber music
Reply #1 on: June 02, 2008, 07:12:52 PM
Mozart - Piano Quartet in G minor, K478.  This quartet is very musically pleasing so it is worth trying.  Since Mozart uses motives rather than long winding melodies, it's easier to build the structure of the piece.

Ensemble-wise, it's probably more accessible to new players.

Offline indutrial

  • PS Silver Member
  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 870
Re: Chamber music
Reply #2 on: June 02, 2008, 07:15:27 PM
Martinu wrote two piano quintets and a piano quartet, all three of which are excellent. I would also recommend Faure's piano quartets and Milhaud's later piano quartet, op. 417 (1966). Being a huge fan of French and Parisian musics from 1875-1950 (later romanticism through neo-classicalism) I listen to absolutely tons of chamber music.

As far as other quintets, I would highly recommend checking out Grazyna Bacewicz's 2 piano quintets. Both are pretty stunning and inventive contributions to the modern repertoire from a composer whose work sports a real "timeless" cross-genre quality.

These works are probably damned difficult compared to the more standard suggestions that are bound to come forth. In any event, you should check them out just because they are awesome.

Offline webern78

  • PS Silver Member
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 214
Re: Chamber music
Reply #3 on: June 03, 2008, 02:04:15 AM
Martinu wrote two piano quintets and a piano quartet, all three of which are excellent. I would also recommend Faure's piano quartets and Milhaud's later piano quartet, op. 417 (1966). Being a huge fan of French and Parisian musics from 1875-1950 (later romanticism through neo-classicalism) I listen to absolutely tons of chamber music.

I generally tend to find both Martinu and Milhaud to be somewhat boring, but that's me i guess.

Faure is of course excellent, and just as good (and better in some ways) are the works of his pupil, the Romanian Enescu. The latter is excruciatingly difficult thought.

I also second Mozart's piano quartets, which are small masterworks. Beethoven only wrote one quartet and it's pretty bland, wouldn't bother with it. Schumann and Mendelssohn wrote some good pieces, then you have Brahms, which wrote two piano quartets and two quintets which are among the finest in the genre, though they are pretty tough to perform.

Then you have Reger, Taneyev, Chausson, Shostakovich (early one but it's good), and among more contemporary composers, Schnittke wrote a quartet and a quintet both of which are excellent. And if you want to try something truly esoteric, Kapustin wrote a Piano Quintet which is a real riot, and probably fun as hell to play.

You could also expand the repertory a bit by performing some piano trios, if that's an option.

Offline slobone

  • PS Silver Member
  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1059
Re: Chamber music
Reply #4 on: June 03, 2008, 09:08:18 PM
The Brahms piano quartets are great pieces, especially #1 and #3. I don't think Schubert wrote anything for that exact combination, but there's always the Trout if you can find a bassist. Or the two trios.

And I second Fauré, you can't do better than that.

But what level are you at? I've always been told that the piano part in most chamber music is the hardest part.

Offline michel dvorsky

  • PS Silver Member
  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 390
Re: Chamber music
Reply #5 on: June 04, 2008, 12:09:48 AM
Nice to see the Taneyev piano quintet get a mention.

The Dvorak A Major is great too.
"Sokolov did a SH***Y job of playing Rachmaninoff's 3rd Piano Concerto." - Perfect_Pitch

Offline ahinton

  • PS Silver Member
  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 12149
Re: Chamber music
Reply #6 on: June 04, 2008, 06:56:37 AM
Faure is of course excellent, and just as good (and better in some ways) are the works of his pupil, the Romanian Enescu. The latter is excruciatingly difficult thought.
Good to see plugs for Chausson and Fauré, who are indeed excellent. If you can find another violinist, Chausson's Concert for violin, piano and string quartet is a real must; as to Fauré, for all his characteristic understatedness, he exerted quite a wide influence at one time, especially over French composers. Enescu has much to offer but, as you say, some of his work is pretty tough to bring off.

Then there's two fine piano quintets by Bloch, there's Bax and Bridge in England (Bridge's second piano trio being one of the very finest since the Archduke, along with the Tchaikovsky and the Ravel, I think - and, as it happens, Bridge played viola in the première of Fauré's C minor piano quartet).

To return to France, there are interesting (though far from well known) piano quintets by de Bréville and le Flem (the latter of which dates from 1911 although its composer died only 24 years ago at the age of 103), but the real star among French piano quintets is surely that of Florent Schmitt; it's as difficult to play as it seems to have been for him to compose (it took him 7 years) and its three movements occupy more than 50 minutes, so it's on an even more ambitious scale than those of Brahms - it's actually dedicated to Fauré and is, for me, one of the peaks of the piano quintet literature from any era.

While on the subject of piano quintets that took their composers an inordinately long time to write, the world record must surely be held by Medtner, who began his only one in 1904 but did not complete it until 45 years later, not long before he died; it isn't his finest work (although sadly I think that he believed that it was so) but it's still got a lot going for it and is well worth investigating.

Now if only Chopin had survived as long as his near-contemporaries Liszt and Alkan...

Anyway, back to work (on a piano quintet, curiously!...)

Best,

Alistair
Alistair Hinton
Curator / Director
The Sorabji Archive

Offline indutrial

  • PS Silver Member
  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 870
Re: Chamber music
Reply #7 on: June 04, 2008, 03:00:13 PM
Another very nice quintet that I heard performed a few years ago was Tansman's Musique a Cinque, which is a relatively recent typesetting from the Eschig-Salabert-Durand catalogue. The quintet is very reminiscent of Tansman's last two string quartets (7 and 8) in terms of the harmonic and rhythmic approaches. I believe that one part of the quintet was actually fully-incorporated into #8 if I remember correctly. The piano part, I can only imagine, is probably just about as difficult as most of his other music for that instrument. I don't play piano or any of the bowed string instruments, but I'm certain that his work is on the tricky side, especially since he was partial to writing swift toccata sections and crazy scherzos in a lot of his works, all the while employing dense modal and polytonal harmonies and rhythmic accents that often have little to do with the time signature written. I mean, it's not Carter/Wuorinen/etc.. difficult, but it definitely requires a stacked set of players.

Offline camstrings

  • PS Silver Member
  • Jr. Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 83
Re: Chamber music
Reply #8 on: June 04, 2008, 03:27:03 PM
ABRSM in UK do an ensemble syllabus. They are graded in 3 levels. You might get some ideas from there.

Offline tompilk

  • PS Silver Member
  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1247
Re: Chamber music
Reply #9 on: June 04, 2008, 04:21:48 PM
the brahms g minor op. 25 piano quartet is just... amazing...
Working on: Schubert - Piano Sonata D.664, Ravel - Sonatine, Ginastera - Danzas Argentinas

Offline russda_man

  • PS Silver Member
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 119
Re: Chamber music
Reply #10 on: June 05, 2008, 11:38:17 AM
I am semi-professional, and have a place at the Royal Northern College of Music (not boasting!), so I I'm good enough, but it's been a fair few years since I done chamber music! Thanks for your information!
Russ.

Offline russda_man

  • PS Silver Member
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 119
Re: Chamber music
Reply #11 on: June 05, 2008, 11:43:50 AM
Thank you for all your information. You have opened my eyes! Brahms seems to be mentioned quite often, so I will try that. And Faure. I would be interested in late 20th century works too. Thanks again.
Russ.

Offline mike_lang

  • PS Silver Member
  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1496
Re: Chamber music
Reply #12 on: June 05, 2008, 12:38:11 PM
For more information about this topic, click search below!

Piano Street Magazine:
Pianist Ruth Slenczynska at 100 – A Unique Musical Messenger!

Ruth Slenczynska, one of the most mesmerizing pianists alive today, celebrates her 100th birthday on January 15, 2025. A former child prodigy, her nine-decade career represents a living link to the Golden Age of the Piano, embodying its spirit through her artistry, her lineage, and her role as a keeper of its traditions. Read more
 

Logo light pianostreet.com - the website for classical pianists, piano teachers, students and piano music enthusiasts.

Subscribe for unlimited access

Sign up

Follow us

Piano Street Digicert